Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5961 - 5970 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 5961 - 5970 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
WCCA Oversight Committee minutes March 2017
Brandt from the Office of Court Operations provided data showing how many cases would be removed from
/courts/committees/docs/wccaminutes0317.pdf - 2017-05-03
Brandt from the Office of Court Operations provided data showing how many cases would be removed from
/courts/committees/docs/wccaminutes0317.pdf - 2017-05-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have moved the circuit court to extend probation until he had paid the fees or obtained a civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199535 - 2017-11-01
have moved the circuit court to extend probation until he had paid the fees or obtained a civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199535 - 2017-11-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in a divorce case is committed to the circuit court’s discretion. LeMere v. LeMere, 2003 WI 67, ¶13, 262 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995848 - 2025-08-12
in a divorce case is committed to the circuit court’s discretion. LeMere v. LeMere, 2003 WI 67, ¶13, 262 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995848 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 13, 2023 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667905 - 2023-06-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 13, 2023 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667905 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the cases. The circuit court denied Ardell’s motion, concluding that Ardell failed to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178950 - 2017-09-21
of the cases. The circuit court denied Ardell’s motion, concluding that Ardell failed to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178950 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the status element to the jury in this case was an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. at 651.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28
the status element to the jury in this case was an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. at 651.[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 13-03 - Comments from Wisconsin State Bar
apply to the Supreme Court for transfer to active status. As part of the application the person must
/supreme/docs/1303commentsstatebar.pdf - 2013-09-04
apply to the Supreme Court for transfer to active status. As part of the application the person must
/supreme/docs/1303commentsstatebar.pdf - 2013-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
and Allbaugh’s testimony, and there is no indication the court relied on any information regarding the civil case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62517 - 2011-04-06
and Allbaugh’s testimony, and there is no indication the court relied on any information regarding the civil case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62517 - 2011-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
. The online site reflects case information entered by court staff. [5] Perry does not contest the veracity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46523 - 2010-02-01
. The online site reflects case information entered by court staff. [5] Perry does not contest the veracity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46523 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the disposition of this case, the court accepts them at face value. No. 2009AP262 3 Bartz filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45266 - 2014-09-15
to the disposition of this case, the court accepts them at face value. No. 2009AP262 3 Bartz filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45266 - 2014-09-15