Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5921 - 5930 of 66224 for did.
Search results 5921 - 5930 of 66224 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller - 2002AP002169
Miller. During negotiations, Miller took the position that he did not want any felony convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5552 - 2017-09-19
Miller. During negotiations, Miller took the position that he did not want any felony convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5552 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Stacy Renee Wiemeri v. Brian Scott Wiemeri - 2018AP001657
maintenance; and (2) reserving jurisdiction over the parties’ property division. We conclude the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242744 - 2019-06-25
maintenance; and (2) reserving jurisdiction over the parties’ property division. We conclude the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242744 - 2019-06-25
State v. Christopher D. Hughes - 2006AP003168
and Ara Davis take the car’s rims off and sell them. According to Christopher Hughes, he did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30728 - 2007-10-29
and Ara Davis take the car’s rims off and sell them. According to Christopher Hughes, he did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30728 - 2007-10-29
[PDF]
Dane Co. DHS v. Sophia S. - 2011AP002639
Sophia that if she again did not appear in person, she would be subject to being found in default. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78632 - 2014-09-15
Sophia that if she again did not appear in person, she would be subject to being found in default. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78632 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph Steffes - 2002AP001300
conclude that the opening of the envelope outside Steffes’s presence did not violate Steffes’s Sixth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5257 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the opening of the envelope outside Steffes’s presence did not violate Steffes’s Sixth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5257 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ward J. - 2004AP001393
to uphold the jury’s verdict and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7532 - 2005-03-31
to uphold the jury’s verdict and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7532 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jovan T. Mull - 2017AP001752
ever did anything, I said I did it; but I—I’m just pleading guilty because, Your Honor, I don’t feel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
ever did anything, I said I did it; but I—I’m just pleading guilty because, Your Honor, I don’t feel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
[PDF]
State v. Shawn L. Paholke - 2016AP001504
the circuit court erred by denying his motion. We conclude the circuit court did not erroneously exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199862 - 2017-10-31
the circuit court erred by denying his motion. We conclude the circuit court did not erroneously exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199862 - 2017-10-31
[PDF]
State v. Mitchell A. Lange - 2008AP000882
, we state the issue on review as follows: Did the law enforcement officer, at the time
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36808 - 2014-09-15
, we state the issue on review as follows: Did the law enforcement officer, at the time
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36808 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mitchell A. Lange - 2008AP000882
: Did the law enforcement officer, at the time of the defendant's arrest, have probable cause under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36808 - 2009-06-15
: Did the law enforcement officer, at the time of the defendant's arrest, have probable cause under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36808 - 2009-06-15