Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5851 - 5860 of 66224 for did.

State v. Andrae D. Howell - 2005AP000731
occurring both within and outside the plea colloquy. ¶6 The court of appeals did not review Howell's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29464 - 2007-06-20

State v. Richard A. Moeck - 2003AP000002
. Not Participating: ROGGENSACK, J., did not participate. Attorneys: For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18067 - 2005-05-05

[PDF] State v. Andrae D. Howell - 2005AP000731
and outside the plea colloquy. ¶6 The court of appeals did not review Howell's motion as a Bangert motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29464 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Forest S. Shomberg - 2004AP000630
. ¶2 We conclude that the circuit court did not, at the time of its decision in 2002, erroneously
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21182 - 2017-09-21

James J. Gross v. Woodman's Food Market, Inc. - 2001AP001746
) it is undisputed that Woodman’s did not come within the exception of § 100.30(6)(a)7 for meeting a competitor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4128 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James J. Gross v. Woodman's Food Market, Inc. - 2001AP001746
or the proscribed effect; (4) it is undisputed that Woodman’s did not come within the exception of § 100.30(6)(a)7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4128 - 2017-09-20

State v. Forest S. Shomberg - 2004AP000630
that the circuit court did not, at the time of its decision in 2002, erroneously exercise its discretion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21182 - 2006-01-30

State v. Andres Romero-Georgana - 2012AP000055
. The motion did not mention any defect in the plea colloquy. ¶17 On August 23, 2007, the circuit court held
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117782 - 2014-09-07

[PDF] State v. Andres Romero-Georgana - 2012AP000055
No. 2012AP55 7 been decided less than a month earlier. The motion did not mention any defect
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117782 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey L. Elverman - 2014AP000354
on appeal: (1) that the complaint was defective because it did not sufficiently give him notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154323 - 2017-09-21