Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5851 - 5860 of 37259 for affidavit of mailing.

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel R. Grade - 2006AP000814
of the statutes, and mailing shall be sufficient service, except that the court may determine that additional
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29810 - 2014-09-15

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel R. Grade - 2006AP000814
, notice by publication of a class 1 notice, as provided in ch. 985 of the statutes, and mailing shall
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29810 - 2007-07-23

State v. Bobby L. Byers - 2013AP000161
(1977). Directing us to an e-mail in his appendix from a SORP agent, Byers argues that his sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98879 - 2013-07-02

[PDF] Float-Rite Park, Inc. v. Village of Somerset - 2001AP000218
, such as mailing notices to land owners within 100 feet of the premises, reviewing the site and holding a public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3534 - 2017-09-19

Vulcan Materials Company v. Stripe-N-Seal Corporation - 1995AP003506
that Neiman received actual notice that the invoices were not paid from mailings to Stripe-N-Seal’s office
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10127 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Vulcan Materials Company v. Stripe-N-Seal Corporation - 1995AP003506
also concluded that Neiman received actual notice that the invoices were not paid from mailings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10127 - 2017-09-19

State v. Chad A. Achterberg - 1994AP003360
of forfeiture under sub. (1) shall be mailed forthwith by the clerk to the defendant and the defendant's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16972 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph L. Young - 2005AP002598
and circumstances pertaining to the alleged misconduct within 20 days after being served by ordinary mail
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26021 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Judith A. Pinchar - 2002AP002950
, a second letter was sent to Attorney Pinchar via both first-class mail and certified mail. The certified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16686 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph L. Young - 2005AP002598
mail receipt for the second letter. ¶8 On May 25, 2004, Attorney Young was personally served
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26021 - 2006-07-26