Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5831 - 5840 of 66224 for did.
Search results 5831 - 5840 of 66224 for did.
[PDF]
Jason J. Zimmel v. Kathleen M. Garrity - 2015AP000115
spousal support, effective on November 15, 2013. Jason did not pay support under the temporary order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159448 - 2017-09-21
spousal support, effective on November 15, 2013. Jason did not pay support under the temporary order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159448 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Burns - 2010AP000569
was denied as “merely a rehash of everything that was previously presented[.]” Burns did not appeal. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66208 - 2014-09-15
was denied as “merely a rehash of everything that was previously presented[.]” Burns did not appeal. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66208 - 2014-09-15
State v. Prentiss L. Farr - 1995AP001158
to participate in drug activity and that he sold controlled substances to individuals he did not know, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8974 - 2005-03-31
to participate in drug activity and that he sold controlled substances to individuals he did not know, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8974 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Paul - 2001AP001514
because he did not call as a witness Joe W., a fellow employee whom Paul wanted to suggest to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4051 - 2005-03-31
because he did not call as a witness Joe W., a fellow employee whom Paul wanted to suggest to the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4051 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles Jasper, Jr. - 2000AP000865
to sentencing, Jasper did not reveal to anyone, including his lawyer, that he had a drug addiction or mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2440 - 2005-03-31
to sentencing, Jasper did not reveal to anyone, including his lawyer, that he had a drug addiction or mental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2440 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John Paul - 2001AP001514
trial counsel was ineffective because he did not call as a witness Joe W., a fellow employee whom Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4051 - 2017-09-20
trial counsel was ineffective because he did not call as a witness Joe W., a fellow employee whom Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4051 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael Schulteis - 2001AP001677
and that he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice. Because the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4102 - 2017-09-20
and that he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice. Because the trial court did not err
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4102 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Vistelar, LLC v. Cincinnati Specialty Underwriters Insurance Company - 2019AP000633
determined that Cincinnati did not have a duty to defend No. 2019AP633 2 Vistelar against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255068 - 2020-02-25
determined that Cincinnati did not have a duty to defend No. 2019AP633 2 Vistelar against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255068 - 2020-02-25
[PDF]
State v. Prentiss L. Farr - 1995AP001158
he did not know, contrary to his contentions that he was not encouraging anyone else to use drugs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8974 - 2017-09-19
he did not know, contrary to his contentions that he was not encouraging anyone else to use drugs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8974 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kurt V. Richardson - 2006AP001992
motor vehicle. We conclude the officer did not. We therefore reverse the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28697 - 2014-09-15
motor vehicle. We conclude the officer did not. We therefore reverse the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28697 - 2014-09-15