Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 581 - 590 of 68445 for did.

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - April 2023
of involuntary medication for Anderson but did not specify a treatment plan. The circuit court agreed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644922 - 2023-04-11

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
standing to assert this claim. We conclude Neitzel did not have standing because, at the time the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
discretion when it did not refer McCotry to the state public defender for an indigency determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96778 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
) erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not refer McCotry to the state public defender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96778 - 2013-05-20

Patricia Martin v. Personnel Review Board of the County of Milwaukee
relevant evidence, and d) in its failure to provide explicit and specific findings; 3) the Board did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4843 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
difficulties in communicating in an adequate way,” but he also indicated that he did not know whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256683 - 2020-03-16

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Forster
place. The one-night camp reunion did nothing to improve Grant’s behavior and attitude. ¶4 On March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5005 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
after the victim’s mother and Anton eventually broke up and he moved out, although Anton did attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95626 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by Robin as a “single person.” ¶4 Lisa, who was still married to Robin, did not know that he intended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207735 - 2018-01-30

[PDF] Patricia Martin v. Personnel Review Board of the County of Milwaukee
) the Board did not apply applicable legal standards in its decision; 4) the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4843 - 2017-09-19