Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5771 - 5780 of 66224 for did.
Search results 5771 - 5780 of 66224 for did.
Daniel K. T., Jr. v. Sara K. L. - 1998AP001034
conclude that the trial court’s finding that the parties did not reach a valid and binding stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13873 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the trial court’s finding that the parties did not reach a valid and binding stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13873 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Daniel K. T., Jr. v. Sara K. L. - 1998AP001034
conclude that the trial court’s finding that the parties did No. 98-1034 2 not reach a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13873 - 2014-09-15
conclude that the trial court’s finding that the parties did No. 98-1034 2 not reach a valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13873 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert M. Madden - 1999AP001956
.” Because the plea colloquy did not violate the law, because Madden cannot prove his ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15786 - 2017-09-21
.” Because the plea colloquy did not violate the law, because Madden cannot prove his ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15786 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert M. Madden - 1999AP001956
.” Because the plea colloquy did not violate the law, because Madden cannot prove his ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15786 - 2005-03-31
.” Because the plea colloquy did not violate the law, because Madden cannot prove his ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15786 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel J. Jurkovic - 1999AP003231
in this case constitute a refusal, the trial court did not err in so concluding, and this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16299 - 2005-03-31
in this case constitute a refusal, the trial court did not err in so concluding, and this court affirms. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16299 - 2005-03-31
Kevin Kirsch v. Pat Siedschlag - 1996AP000509
erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10414 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10414 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kevin Kirsch v. Pat Siedschlag - 1996AP000509
erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10414 - 2017-09-20
erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion. We conclude the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10414 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Donald Savinski - 1997AP001508
of the word “has” in both the present and past tense in the same sentence confused the jury, and (2) it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12522 - 2017-09-21
of the word “has” in both the present and past tense in the same sentence confused the jury, and (2) it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12522 - 2017-09-21
State v. Diane R. - 1998AP000344
has been filed “has no further jurisdiction”). Diane R. did not appear on August 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13597 - 2005-03-31
has been filed “has no further jurisdiction”). Diane R. did not appear on August 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13597 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Raul M. Cordova - 1998AP001784
-94. He argues that the circuit court erred when it did not suppress evidence obtained from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14185 - 2014-09-15
-94. He argues that the circuit court erred when it did not suppress evidence obtained from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14185 - 2014-09-15