Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5601 - 5610 of 35954 for affidavit of mailing.
Search results 5601 - 5610 of 35954 for affidavit of mailing.
COURT OF APPEALS
numbered Wis. Stat. § 767.245(2m), (3), and (3c). [8] The respondent’s brief was mailed November 18, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35267 - 2009-01-20
numbered Wis. Stat. § 767.245(2m), (3), and (3c). [8] The respondent’s brief was mailed November 18, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35267 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
Basic Metals, Inc. v. Mahzel Metals
in that amount and wrote on the back of the check “In Full Payment of Invoice #331138.” Mahzel then mailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19601 - 2017-09-21
in that amount and wrote on the back of the check “In Full Payment of Invoice #331138.” Mahzel then mailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19601 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Clarissa W.
was contrary to the assertion of case manager, Lynn Bade, that a bus pass had been mailed to Clarissa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25564 - 2017-09-21
was contrary to the assertion of case manager, Lynn Bade, that a bus pass had been mailed to Clarissa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25564 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Judith A. Pinchar
4, 2002, a second letter was sent to Attorney Pinchar via both first-class mail and certified mail
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16686 - 2005-03-31
4, 2002, a second letter was sent to Attorney Pinchar via both first-class mail and certified mail
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16686 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
from Mallett was a motion for discovery which was sent by mail and received by the City Attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53101 - 2010-08-09
from Mallett was a motion for discovery which was sent by mail and received by the City Attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53101 - 2010-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
informing her he forwarded three pieces of personal mail to her new address. He also noted carpet damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60488 - 2011-02-28
informing her he forwarded three pieces of personal mail to her new address. He also noted carpet damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60488 - 2011-02-28
Float-Rite Park, Inc. v. Village of Somerset
for issuing a conditional use permit, such as mailing notices to land owners within 100 feet of the premises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3534 - 2005-03-31
for issuing a conditional use permit, such as mailing notices to land owners within 100 feet of the premises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3534 - 2005-03-31
Basic Metals, Inc. v. Mahzel Metals
“In Full Payment of Invoice #331138.” Mahzel then mailed the check to the bin number address as directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19601 - 2005-10-30
“In Full Payment of Invoice #331138.” Mahzel then mailed the check to the bin number address as directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19601 - 2005-10-30
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of preparing, printing, delivering, and mailing absentee ballots by the statutorily required deadlines.6 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760485 - 2024-02-02
of preparing, printing, delivering, and mailing absentee ballots by the statutorily required deadlines.6 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760485 - 2024-02-02
Rule Order
of papers; use of mail. (a) All filings – general rule. Except as provided in pars. (b) to (e), filing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35121 - 2009-01-05
of papers; use of mail. (a) All filings – general rule. Except as provided in pars. (b) to (e), filing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35121 - 2009-01-05