Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 561 - 570 of 66218 for did.
Search results 561 - 570 of 66218 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Troy J. Olmsted - 2006AP001813
court did not err by resentencing Olmsted on only the substantial battery charge. We also hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29039 - 2014-09-15
court did not err by resentencing Olmsted on only the substantial battery charge. We also hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29039 - 2014-09-15
State v. Troy J. Olmsted - 2006AP001813
that the trial court did not err by resentencing Olmsted on only the substantial battery charge. We also hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
that the trial court did not err by resentencing Olmsted on only the substantial battery charge. We also hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
State v. Herbert Ascher - 2000AP000426
and thereby imposed an unduly harsh sentence. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2263 - 2005-03-31
and thereby imposed an unduly harsh sentence. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2263 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Herbert Ascher - 2000AP000426
. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2263 - 2017-09-19
. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2263 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jonathan J. English-Lancaster - 2001AP001455
-Lancaster has waived this issue because he did not enter a contemporaneous objection to the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4023 - 2005-03-31
-Lancaster has waived this issue because he did not enter a contemporaneous objection to the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4023 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan J. English-Lancaster - 2001AP001455
-Lancaster has waived this issue because he did not enter a contemporaneous objection to the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4023 - 2017-09-20
-Lancaster has waived this issue because he did not enter a contemporaneous objection to the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4023 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Shannon E. Parker - 2018AP002160
that the police department did not follow proper lineup procedures. However, appellate counsel did raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297207 - 2020-10-21
that the police department did not follow proper lineup procedures. However, appellate counsel did raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297207 - 2020-10-21
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court oral argument - April 2023
of involuntary medication for Anderson but did not specify a treatment plan. The circuit court agreed
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsapr2023.pdf - 2023-04-12
of involuntary medication for Anderson but did not specify a treatment plan. The circuit court agreed
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsapr2023.pdf - 2023-04-12
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April 2023
of involuntary medication for Anderson but did not specify a treatment plan. The circuit court agreed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644922 - 2023-04-11
of involuntary medication for Anderson but did not specify a treatment plan. The circuit court agreed
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644922 - 2023-04-11
State v. Timothy L. Neitzel - 2007AP002346
standing to assert this claim. We conclude Neitzel did not have standing because, at the time the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
standing to assert this claim. We conclude Neitzel did not have standing because, at the time the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23