Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5511 - 5520 of 68463 for did.
Search results 5511 - 5520 of 68463 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 1998) (whether to retain adult jurisdiction is discretionary with the circuit court). McQuay did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341091 - 2021-03-03
. 1998) (whether to retain adult jurisdiction is discretionary with the circuit court). McQuay did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341091 - 2021-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), third offense. Wold argues that the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75108 - 2012-12-17
the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), third offense. Wold argues that the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75108 - 2012-12-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
his right to an alternate test. At the hearing, the State did not offer any evidence; however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31980 - 2014-09-15
his right to an alternate test. At the hearing, the State did not offer any evidence; however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31980 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
La Crosse County DHS v. Sharon P.
litem did not object to the discovery order. ¶3 On February 11, 2005, a status hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20574 - 2017-09-21
litem did not object to the discovery order. ¶3 On February 11, 2005, a status hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20574 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr.
burden of proof as to the repeater allegation because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13238 - 2017-09-21
burden of proof as to the repeater allegation because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13238 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” At a bench trial, the County apparently proceeded under the assumption that it did not need to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46368 - 2014-09-15
.” At a bench trial, the County apparently proceeded under the assumption that it did not need to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46368 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Arthur G. Ptack
, Ptack moved the court to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds that he did not understand the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12503 - 2017-09-21
, Ptack moved the court to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds that he did not understand the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12503 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
proceeded under the assumption that it did not need to prove the amount of the expansion, but rather simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46368 - 2010-01-27
proceeded under the assumption that it did not need to prove the amount of the expansion, but rather simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46368 - 2010-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, in effect, at the critical stage of pretrial proceedings when trial counsel did not adequately prepare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042037 - 2025-11-25
, in effect, at the critical stage of pretrial proceedings when trial counsel did not adequately prepare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042037 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
WI APP 32
claim that Credit Acceptance filed its deficiency action in violation of the WCA when it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92717 - 2014-09-15
claim that Credit Acceptance filed its deficiency action in violation of the WCA when it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92717 - 2014-09-15