Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5491 - 5500 of 66224 for did.

Melissa Bevan v. Aaron Alder - 2014AP000453
believed that it did not have statutory authority to grant his request for an adjournment. In denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129474 - 2014-11-19

State v. Benjamin L. Parr - 2013AP000171
or gratification and Parr did not understand that element; (2) the court failed to confirm Parr’s understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109979 - 2014-04-07

[PDF] State v. Benjamin L. Parr - 2013AP000171
of sexual arousal or gratification and Parr did not understand that element; (2) the court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109979 - 2017-09-21

Ervin Merten v. Carl Holzer - 1997AP000075
was not fully aware of all of the details of the negotiated agreement, did not expect to be bound by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11935 - 2005-03-31

State v. Feliciano T. Douglas - 2002AP003383
. And after you and he left the jail, … when did you see him again? A Well, approximately four years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5997 - 2005-03-31

John A. Rooyakkers v. Village of Little Chute - 1995AP000582
finding that the Rooyakkers and Stricks did not accrue a benefit from the mini-storm sewer was not clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8704 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Douglas J. Miller - 2001AP000546
. However, this motion did not challenge the warrantless seizure of his blood by the police following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Richard P. Cline v. Kristine H. Zynda - 1998AP002380
from Kristine H. Zynda, f/k/a/ Kristine Cline. Cline did not attend the divorce trial, and the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14397 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Karen Mae Keim v. James Keim - 2008AP002911
substantial retirement benefits, while Karen did not. ¶3 During the divorce proceedings, Karen moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41947 - 2014-09-15

Karen Mae Keim v. James Keim - 2008AP002911
substantial retirement benefits, while Karen did not. ¶3 During the divorce proceedings, Karen moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41947 - 2009-10-07