Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 68463 for did.
Search results 5471 - 5480 of 68463 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Joshua J. Alderman
counsel did not move to dismiss one of the two enhancers. However, Alderman’s claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
counsel did not move to dismiss one of the two enhancers. However, Alderman’s claim of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20459 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2014AP1235-CR 3 sentencing” and (2) it failed to explain why it did not follow the PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133580 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP1235-CR 3 sentencing” and (2) it failed to explain why it did not follow the PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133580 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he did not possess the firearm as charged because the firearm belonged to Cullen, not Pitts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162147 - 2017-09-21
that he did not possess the firearm as charged because the firearm belonged to Cullen, not Pitts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Smith
seeking to withdraw the stipulation. He contends that the court did not conduct an No(s). 99-3150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16267 - 2017-09-21
seeking to withdraw the stipulation. He contends that the court did not conduct an No(s). 99-3150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16267 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not offset the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212630 - 2018-05-08
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not offset the restitution
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212630 - 2018-05-08
La Crosse County DHS v. Sharon P.
litem did not object to the discovery order. ¶3 On February 11, 2005, a status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20574 - 2005-12-07
litem did not object to the discovery order. ¶3 On February 11, 2005, a status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20574 - 2005-12-07
State v. Randy J. Smith
-adjudication motions and affidavits seeking to withdraw the stipulation. He contends that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16267 - 2005-03-31
-adjudication motions and affidavits seeking to withdraw the stipulation. He contends that the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16267 - 2005-03-31
Roger Walker v. Dennis Schrimpf
did he owe the Walkers a duty of care. The Walkers argue that Schrimpf created the indentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12600 - 2005-03-31
did he owe the Walkers a duty of care. The Walkers argue that Schrimpf created the indentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12600 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for filing a response. When the State did not respond, the court examined the motion and denied it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
for filing a response. When the State did not respond, the court examined the motion and denied it without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38453 - 2009-07-27
State v. George A. Harper
that he had no recollection of specifically advising White that Harper was operating his truck. Kuehn did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8619 - 2005-03-31
that he had no recollection of specifically advising White that Harper was operating his truck. Kuehn did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8619 - 2005-03-31