Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5441 - 5450 of 68458 for did.
Search results 5441 - 5450 of 68458 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
discretion by not considering Nelson’s character; (2) did not explain the length of the sentence; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27113 - 2006-11-13
discretion by not considering Nelson’s character; (2) did not explain the length of the sentence; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27113 - 2006-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
to second-degree sexual assault of a child. Lopez contends that he did not enter his plea of no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55951 - 2010-11-16
to second-degree sexual assault of a child. Lopez contends that he did not enter his plea of no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55951 - 2010-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
approval of the court—something the Department did not obtain, and that the Department’s unlawful action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53665 - 2005-08-24
approval of the court—something the Department did not obtain, and that the Department’s unlawful action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53665 - 2005-08-24
Frontsheet
.) Dissented: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., BRADLEY, J., dissent. (Opinion filed.) Not Participating: PROSSER, J., did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98355 - 2013-08-26
.) Dissented: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., BRADLEY, J., dissent. (Opinion filed.) Not Participating: PROSSER, J., did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98355 - 2013-08-26
[PDF]
Frontsheet
.) NOT PARTICIPATING: PROSSER, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the defendant-appellant-petitioner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98355 - 2017-09-21
.) NOT PARTICIPATING: PROSSER, J., did not participate. ATTORNEYS: For the defendant-appellant-petitioner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98355 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kurt A. Loewen
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8209 - 2017-09-19
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8209 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Bruce Joseph Croushore v.
to the practice of law. ¶2 We determine that the Board did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17362 - 2017-09-21
to the practice of law. ¶2 We determine that the Board did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
(1) or (2), 948.025, or 948.085 (2) did not involve sexual intercourse, as defined in s. 948.01 (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31962 - 2014-09-15
(1) or (2), 948.025, or 948.085 (2) did not involve sexual intercourse, as defined in s. 948.01 (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31962 - 2014-09-15
State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr.
because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did the State offer ‘any’ proof during the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31
because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did the State offer ‘any’ proof during the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31
Bruce Joseph Croushore v.
that the Board did not erroneously exercise its discretion by not addressing Mr. Croushore’s request for waiver
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17362 - 2005-03-31
that the Board did not erroneously exercise its discretion by not addressing Mr. Croushore’s request for waiver
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17362 - 2005-03-31