Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5401 - 5410 of 66224 for did.

State v. Michael R. Seehafer - 2010AP001280
the police officer’s actions did not violate the Fourth Amendment, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59738 - 2011-02-07

Winnebago County DH&HS v. Lisa L. - 2006AP000253
of the dispositional hearing satisfies us that the court did not act as if the jury had recommended, advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24837 - 2006-04-18

State v. Logan R. C. - 2007AP002058
), 948.025, or 948.085 (2) did not involve sexual intercourse, as defined in s. 948.01 (6), either by the use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31962 - 2008-02-27

[PDF] State v. Joseph C. Elam - 2010AP003054
, and she observed him having a drink and two shots with friends. The bar manager did not see Elam’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81209 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Timothy J. K. - 2011AP001091
of a psychologist’s report. We hold that the court did not misinterpret the report, and affirm the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71621 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jordan T. Kloetzke - 2013AP001556
times in the early stages of the case. The circuit court did not err when it denied counsel’s motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113965 - 2014-06-10

[PDF] Frank Nowak v. Town of Little Suamico - 2018AP001078
. See Tobler, 158 Wis. 2d at 24-25. 2 Nowak did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247724 - 2019-10-01

[PDF] State v. Randy J. Smith - 1999AP003150
seeking to withdraw the stipulation. He contends that the court did not conduct an No(s). 99-3150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16267 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John E. Gobis - 2007AP002039
his right to an alternate test. At the hearing, the State did not offer any evidence; however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31980 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Logan R. C. - 2007AP002058
(1) or (2), 948.025, or 948.085 (2) did not involve sexual intercourse, as defined in s. 948.01 (6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31962 - 2014-09-15