Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 541 - 550 of 68446 for did.
Search results 541 - 550 of 68446 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stated that if he did, it would have been an accident from giving a hug or some accidental touching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79456 - 2014-09-15
stated that if he did, it would have been an accident from giving a hug or some accidental touching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79456 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James A. Sybers
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. He also contends his trial counsel did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5360 - 2017-09-19
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. He also contends his trial counsel did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5360 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
didn’t think so, but then he stated that if he did, it would have been an accident from giving a hug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79456 - 2012-03-13
didn’t think so, but then he stated that if he did, it would have been an accident from giving a hug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79456 - 2012-03-13
[PDF]
State v. James A. Sybers
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. He also contends his trial counsel did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5668 - 2017-09-19
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. He also contends his trial counsel did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5668 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 74
, she asserts that the circuit court did not explain the nature of read-in charges. Second, she argues
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29462 - 2014-09-15
, she asserts that the circuit court did not explain the nature of read-in charges. Second, she argues
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29462 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
court did not err by resentencing Olmsted on only the substantial battery charge. We also hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29039 - 2014-09-15
court did not err by resentencing Olmsted on only the substantial battery charge. We also hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29039 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
, No. 2001AP1928-CRNM (Wis. Ct. App. Nov. 21, 2001). Torres did not respond to counsel’s no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28279 - 2007-03-06
, No. 2001AP1928-CRNM (Wis. Ct. App. Nov. 21, 2001). Torres did not respond to counsel’s no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28279 - 2007-03-06
[PDF]
State v. David G. Rodenkirch
did not have probable cause to arrest him. We agree that the arresting officer had no reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7017 - 2017-09-20
did not have probable cause to arrest him. We agree that the arresting officer had no reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7017 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court did not err by resentencing Olmsted on only the substantial battery charge. We also hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
that the trial court did not err by resentencing Olmsted on only the substantial battery charge. We also hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
James B. Froelich v. Mary L. Stelzer
the delinquent July 2000 payment. Stelzer responded that he still wanted the property, but he did not offer any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17599 - 2005-04-12
the delinquent July 2000 payment. Stelzer responded that he still wanted the property, but he did not offer any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17599 - 2005-04-12