Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5381 - 5390 of 66224 for did.

[PDF] State v. Larry D. Hicks - 2004AP003105
seventy-two hours of the disorderly conduct incident. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18372 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr. - 1997AP003254
burden of proof as to the repeater allegation because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13238 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Sherard D. Jenkins - 2005AP001794
program. Based on that, Jenkins seeks resentencing. Because the trial court did not erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25294 - 2017-09-21

State v. Victor D. Reel - 2005AP001305
Reel argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because his counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28353 - 2007-03-07

[PDF] State v. Victor D. Reel - 2005AP001305
because his counsel did not adequately argue for exclusion of his eleven prior convictions, which were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28353 - 2014-09-15

Village of Westfield v. Roger G. Dubble - 2006AP001681
valid citation issued to Dubble. Therefore, the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30881 - 2007-11-14

[PDF] State v. Daniel W. Morse - 2018AP001293
, is representing himself. ¶2 Morse argues that the conduct charged in this case did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237314 - 2019-03-19

[PDF] State v. Mark H. Malm - 2015AP001339
rejected the proposed agreement. It did not clearly state any specific reason for doing so. At first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217835 - 2018-08-16

State v. Thomas C. Smith - 2001AP002965
and he did not admit that he was a repeater as required by Wis. Stat. §§ 939.62(2) and 973.12(1). Review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4555 - 2005-03-31

Columbia County v. Jason Tyler Lounsbury - 2009AP001880
that supports findings the circuit court did not make. Id. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45138 - 2009-12-29