Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5371 - 5380 of 66224 for did.

State v. Joseph C. Elam - 2010AP003054
in a black truck, and she observed him having a drink and two shots with friends. The bar manager did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81209 - 2012-04-18

[PDF] State v. Adam V. Tovsen - 2003AP003164
to detain him and administer field sobriety tests. We conclude the officer did, and we therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7077 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Douglas T. Meyer - 2001AP000938
pleas or be resentenced because: (1) the State did not follow the procedure set out in WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3811 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Gerrit R. Van Doorn - 2010AP001614
was unavailable at the time. The jury also asked, “Did the defendant say to the police officer ‘I drove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60569 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jill Gilbert-Welytok v. Timothy J. Ziolkowski - 2011AP000572
that it had it issued a new injunction with the same terms as the previous one, and that it did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66566 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Brian S. Wold - 2011AP001518
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. In the alternative, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75108 - 2014-09-15

State v. Brian S. Wold - 2011AP001518
the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), third offense. Wold argues that the arresting officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75108 - 2011-12-18

State v. Kerry L. Chase - 2014AP001235
to explain why it did not follow the PSI recommendation. ¶4 Sentencing rests within the discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133580 - 2015-01-27

[PDF] State v. Kerry L. Chase - 2014AP001235
. No. 2014AP1235-CR 3 sentencing” and (2) it failed to explain why it did not follow the PSI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133580 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas Warren Pitts - 2015AP001056
that he did not possess the firearm as charged because the firearm belonged to Cullen, not Pitts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162147 - 2017-09-21