Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5361 - 5370 of 66224 for did.
Search results 5361 - 5370 of 66224 for did.
State v. Sherard D. Jenkins - 2005AP001794
on that, Jenkins seeks resentencing. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25294 - 2006-05-30
on that, Jenkins seeks resentencing. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25294 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
La Crosse County DHS v. Sharon P. - 2005AP002118
litem did not object to the discovery order. ΒΆ3 On February 11, 2005, a status hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20574 - 2017-09-21
litem did not object to the discovery order. ΒΆ3 On February 11, 2005, a status hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20574 - 2017-09-21
Display Promotions, Inc. v. DoveBid Valuation Services, Inc. - 2004AP000797
. We agree with the circuit court that Display did not fall within the ambit of the foreseeable harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19397 - 2005-08-30
. We agree with the circuit court that Display did not fall within the ambit of the foreseeable harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19397 - 2005-08-30
State v. Joshua J. Alderman - 2004AP001686
performance was deficient because counsel did not move to dismiss one of the two enhancers. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20459 - 2005-11-30
performance was deficient because counsel did not move to dismiss one of the two enhancers. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20459 - 2005-11-30
[PDF]
State v. David V. Pugh, Sr. - 2004AP001439
a vehicle approaching the intersection on Highway 131. The vehicle did not come to a complete stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7538 - 2017-09-19
a vehicle approaching the intersection on Highway 131. The vehicle did not come to a complete stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7538 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kurt A. Loewen - 1994AP002833
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8210 - 2017-09-19
because he did not understand that a mere arrest, as opposed to a conviction, would be a breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8210 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Van Buren Management, Inc. v. Joseph W. Checota - 1995AP001707
that Joel S. Lee did not make a misrepresentation. Because the trial court did not err in rendering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9239 - 2017-09-19
that Joel S. Lee did not make a misrepresentation. Because the trial court did not err in rendering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9239 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Arthur G. Ptack - 1997AP001461
, Ptack moved the court to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds that he did not understand the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12503 - 2017-09-21
, Ptack moved the court to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds that he did not understand the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roger Walker v. Dennis Schrimpf - 1997AP001676
, nor did he owe the Walkers a duty of care. The Walkers argue that Schrimpf created the indentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12600 - 2017-09-21
, nor did he owe the Walkers a duty of care. The Walkers argue that Schrimpf created the indentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12600 - 2017-09-21
Roger Walker v. Dennis Schrimpf - 1997AP001676
did he owe the Walkers a duty of care. The Walkers argue that Schrimpf created the indentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12600 - 2005-03-31
did he owe the Walkers a duty of care. The Walkers argue that Schrimpf created the indentation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12600 - 2005-03-31