Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5351 - 5360 of 66224 for did.

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Patrick R. Russell - 1997AP003619
fees for legal work he performed but did not report to the law firm. The parties stipulated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17334 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Yvette L. Harris - 2016AP002489
. The State alleged Harris did not actually perform all of the billed services. ¶3 The case was tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215149 - 2018-07-03

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel Parks - 2016AP000085
this proceeding on Attorney Parks. The OLR did not seek restitution and the referee did not recommend
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230653 - 2018-12-13

[PDF] Wisconsin Chiropractic Association v. State of Wisconsin Chiropractic Examining Board - 2003AP000933
by Allied Health. The complaint alleged that Allied Health did not qualify as a sponsor of CE programs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6353 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kody R. Kohn - 2020AP002147
the verdict as to the bail-jumping charge. Because the trial court did not err in any respect, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427414 - 2021-09-22

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Cole J. White - 2019AP001162
had previously signed an order for Attorney White to appear at the proceeding, but he did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308767 - 2020-11-25

State v. Carl E. Vines, Sr. - 1997AP003254
because he “neither admitted to any convictions nor did the State offer ‘any’ proof during the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13238 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Steven C. Wizner - 1997AP000693
will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. Wizner argues that the trial court did not advise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12183 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Display Promotions, Inc. v. DoveBid Valuation Services, Inc. - 2004AP000797
. We agree with the circuit court that Display did not fall within the ambit of the foreseeable harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19397 - 2017-09-21

La Crosse County DHS v. Sharon P. - 2005AP002119
litem did not object to the discovery order. ¶3 On February 11, 2005, a status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20574 - 2005-12-07