Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5321 - 5330 of 68445 for did.
Search results 5321 - 5330 of 68445 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
, alleging that he did not validly waive his right to counsel in that prior case. The circuit court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74947 - 2011-12-07
, alleging that he did not validly waive his right to counsel in that prior case. The circuit court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74947 - 2011-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS
was not properly preserved for appeal. He did not object at the sentencing hearing to any perceived error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34224 - 2008-10-06
was not properly preserved for appeal. He did not object at the sentencing hearing to any perceived error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34224 - 2008-10-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
discretion by not considering Nelson’s character; (2) did not explain the length of the sentence; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27113 - 2006-11-13
discretion by not considering Nelson’s character; (2) did not explain the length of the sentence; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27113 - 2006-11-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed he did not recall being in the car. His theory of defense was that Janasik was the driver. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108236 - 2017-09-21
claimed he did not recall being in the car. His theory of defense was that Janasik was the driver. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108236 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael O. Thomas
alone.”). The trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ruling that the contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6005 - 2005-03-31
alone.”). The trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ruling that the contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6005 - 2005-03-31
City of Sheboygan v. Jason R. Zimbal
that the police did not have probable cause to arrest him and that his seizure must fall based on case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7309 - 2005-03-31
that the police did not have probable cause to arrest him and that his seizure must fall based on case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7309 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court made the following explicit and implicit factual findings and rulings. The parties did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860497 - 2024-10-10
, the circuit court made the following explicit and implicit factual findings and rulings. The parties did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=860497 - 2024-10-10
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan v. Jason R. Zimbal
2 his motion to suppress evidence. 2 He argues that the police did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7309 - 2017-09-20
2 his motion to suppress evidence. 2 He argues that the police did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7309 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
after he did work on the waterway without a permit or an exemption. Vogt claims that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86804 - 2012-09-11
after he did work on the waterway without a permit or an exemption. Vogt claims that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86804 - 2012-09-11
[PDF]
Fred C. Hageny, Jr. v. Edwin A. Schowalter
, not for findings the trial court could have made but did not. In re Estate of Becker, 76 Wis.2d 336, 347, 251 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10543 - 2017-09-20
, not for findings the trial court could have made but did not. In re Estate of Becker, 76 Wis.2d 336, 347, 251 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10543 - 2017-09-20