Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 531 - 540 of 20758 for warrants.

[PDF] State v. Mastella L. Jackson - 2014AP002238
statements were included in an affidavit used to obtain a warrant to search her home. Then, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141620 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James E. Multaler - 2000AP001846
a search warrant for evidence implicating him in a series of homicides. He asserts that the affidavit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16406 - 2017-09-21

State v. James E. Multaler - 2000AP001846
executing a search warrant for evidence implicating him in a series of homicides. He asserts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16406 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. George Steven Burch - 2019AP001404
is not warranted because the BCSO acted in good faith. In the alternative, the State argues that if law
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297434 - 2020-10-20

[PDF] State v. Kimy E. Trotter - 1997AP003152
. Trotter next argues that the search was outside of the scope of the warrant because it took place
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13203 - 2017-09-21

State v. Alex B. Park - 2008AP002403
. Szatkowski did not make false statements in his affidavit for the application of the search warrant used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38717 - 2009-08-03

[PDF] State v. Alex B. Park - 2008AP002403
in his affidavit for the application of the search warrant used to search Park’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38717 - 2014-09-15

State v. Andrew Wright - 2006AP001216
“exclusively from a Wisconsin warrant or detainer” under Wis JI—Criminal SM-34A. Wright contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28306 - 2007-03-05

[PDF] State v. Andrew Wright - 2006AP001216
days did not result “exclusively from a Wisconsin warrant or detainer” under WIS JI—CRIMINAL SM-34A
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28306 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Case of the month briefs - Brar
“OF COURSE” FOLLOWED BY A QUESTION AS TO WHETHER THE OFFICER NEEDED A WARRANT. A. The words
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/brar.pdf - 2017-04-05