Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5281 - 5290 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
Search results 5281 - 5290 of 98489 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
to remand this case back to the trial court for retrial. Because the trial court properly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59523 - 2011-02-06
to remand this case back to the trial court for retrial. Because the trial court properly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59523 - 2011-02-06
[PDF]
WCCA Oversight Committee minutes September 2016
was to retain information on WCCA pertaining to case type retention periods set forth in Supreme Court Rule
/courts/committees/docs/wccaminutes0916.pdf - 2016-12-19
was to retain information on WCCA pertaining to case type retention periods set forth in Supreme Court Rule
/courts/committees/docs/wccaminutes0916.pdf - 2016-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
retroactivity in a civil context. In Landgraf, the Court noted that, in addition to the Ex Post Facto Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01
retroactivity in a civil context. In Landgraf, the Court noted that, in addition to the Ex Post Facto Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment does not permit civil courts to adjudicate “strictly and purely ecclesiastical” issues within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862312 - 2024-10-15
Amendment does not permit civil courts to adjudicate “strictly and purely ecclesiastical” issues within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862312 - 2024-10-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
over an earlier case where Michael was the defendant. The court explained that its relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069167 - 2026-01-27
over an earlier case where Michael was the defendant. The court explained that its relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069167 - 2026-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Milwaukee W. Bank, 61 Wis. 2d 671, 214 N.W.2d 33 (1974); Hoida, 291 Wis. 2d 283. In both cases the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65413 - 2014-09-15
. Milwaukee W. Bank, 61 Wis. 2d 671, 214 N.W.2d 33 (1974); Hoida, 291 Wis. 2d 283. In both cases the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65413 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Donald J. Harman v.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1331-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17255 - 2017-09-21
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1331-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17255 - 2017-09-21
Donald J. Harman v.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1331-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17255 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1331-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17255 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, because even assuming that the circuit court was unaware of Romero’s status at sentencing, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102466 - 2017-09-21
, because even assuming that the circuit court was unaware of Romero’s status at sentencing, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102466 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
agreeing that the Court, meaning me, Judge Persick, can grant a commitment in your case; is that correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909592 - 2025-02-05
agreeing that the Court, meaning me, Judge Persick, can grant a commitment in your case; is that correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909592 - 2025-02-05