Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5271 - 5280 of 66224 for did.
Search results 5271 - 5280 of 66224 for did.
State v. Paul Sappington - 1999AP002969
that he did not recall the assault and that this might be attributable to a sleep disorder associated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16200 - 2005-03-31
that he did not recall the assault and that this might be attributable to a sleep disorder associated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16200 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Fredrick J. B. - 2007AP000745
physically and verbally abusive, and that there was tension in the household. She said she did not feel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31968 - 2014-09-15
physically and verbally abusive, and that there was tension in the household. She said she did not feel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31968 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Thomas W. Fliess, Jr. v. Dragutin Vicentic - 2021AP000934
was accepted. The closing was set to occur on February 28, 2018. It is undisputed the closing did not occur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528426 - 2022-06-08
was accepted. The closing was set to occur on February 28, 2018. It is undisputed the closing did not occur
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528426 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
State v. Devis K. Osinski - 2009AP002878
is entitled to be resentenced because (1) the court did Nos. 2009AP2878-CR 2009AP2879-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
is entitled to be resentenced because (1) the court did Nos. 2009AP2878-CR 2009AP2879-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62911 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Waukesha County DH&HS v. Michelle P. - 2009AP001087
did not obtain, and that the Department’s unlawful action prejudiced her ability to improve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53665 - 2014-09-15
did not obtain, and that the Department’s unlawful action prejudiced her ability to improve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53665 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. La Dousier - 2006AP000991
ineffective assistance of counsel because his counsel did not object to a statement made by a State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28816 - 2014-09-15
ineffective assistance of counsel because his counsel did not object to a statement made by a State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28816 - 2014-09-15
Waukesha County DH&HS v. Michelle P. - 2009AP001087
approval of the court—something the Department did not obtain, and that the Department’s unlawful action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53665 - 2010-08-24
approval of the court—something the Department did not obtain, and that the Department’s unlawful action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53665 - 2010-08-24
Honorable Mark J. McGinnis v. Mario Jimenez - 2010AP002208
the circuit court did not have authority to sanction him under § 938.355(6m)(ag) because that statute does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59236 - 2011-01-24
the circuit court did not have authority to sanction him under § 938.355(6m)(ag) because that statute does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59236 - 2011-01-24
[PDF]
Honorable Mark J. McGinnis v. Mario Jimenez - 2010AP002208
unless otherwise noted. No. 2010AP2208 2 the circuit court did not have authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59236 - 2014-09-15
unless otherwise noted. No. 2010AP2208 2 the circuit court did not have authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59236 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael O. Thomas - 2002AP003410
alone.”). The trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ruling that the contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6005 - 2005-03-31
alone.”). The trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ruling that the contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6005 - 2005-03-31