Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5221 - 5230 of 66224 for did.
Search results 5221 - 5230 of 66224 for did.
City of New Berlin v. William P. Servi - 2006AP000536
was a urine test. He then told Servi that “if [Servi] did take our breath test, then he also had the option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26568 - 2006-09-26
was a urine test. He then told Servi that “if [Servi] did take our breath test, then he also had the option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26568 - 2006-09-26
[PDF]
City of New Berlin v. William P. Servi - 2006AP000536
and the secondary test was a urine test. He then told Servi that “if [Servi] did take our breath test, then he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26568 - 2017-09-21
and the secondary test was a urine test. He then told Servi that “if [Servi] did take our breath test, then he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26568 - 2017-09-21
State v. Douglas E. Smith - 2002AP000393
court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4933 - 2005-03-31
court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4933 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas E. Smith - 2002AP000393
that the trial court did not adequately instruct the jury. He also claims that his trial lawyer did not give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4933 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court did not adequately instruct the jury. He also claims that his trial lawyer did not give
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4933 - 2017-09-19
Alan D. Eisenberg v. Milwaukee County Circuit Court - 2000AP000331
that Eisenberg “did not appear in court.” The case was adjourned to June 24, 1999, before Judge Kuhnmuench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2232 - 2005-03-31
that Eisenberg “did not appear in court.” The case was adjourned to June 24, 1999, before Judge Kuhnmuench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2232 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Alan D. Eisenberg v. Milwaukee County Circuit Court - 2000AP000331
, 1999. Although Uhrman showed up on June 14, the docket sheets reveal that Eisenberg “did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2232 - 2017-09-19
, 1999. Although Uhrman showed up on June 14, the docket sheets reveal that Eisenberg “did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2232 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Zachary Seth Williams - 2017AP002203
faced. The court did not explicitly state during the colloquy that Williams had a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
faced. The court did not explicitly state during the colloquy that Williams had a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230803 - 2018-12-18
[PDF]
State v. Thomas D. Kent - 2020AP000708
the circuit court that he would not sign the paperwork because he did not want “to contract.” When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372454 - 2021-06-02
the circuit court that he would not sign the paperwork because he did not want “to contract.” When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372454 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
State v. Jody E. Larson - 2013AP000914
, he saw Freitag speak with Larson through the window of Larson’s vehicle. Lichucki did not know
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108969 - 2017-09-21
, he saw Freitag speak with Larson through the window of Larson’s vehicle. Lichucki did not know
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lafayette Co. HSD v. A. W. - 2016AP000324
] deceased siblings.” A.W. did not challenge or seek modification of the dispositional order. J.L.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165703 - 2017-09-21
] deceased siblings.” A.W. did not challenge or seek modification of the dispositional order. J.L.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165703 - 2017-09-21