Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 511 - 520 of 68463 for did.
Search results 511 - 520 of 68463 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
, according to Hannon, and the deficient performance prejudiced his defense. We conclude counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32083 - 2008-03-12
, according to Hannon, and the deficient performance prejudiced his defense. We conclude counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32083 - 2008-03-12
[PDF]
Winnebago County Department of Human Services v. Nannette C.
was deficient, his failure to introduce her condition to the jury did not result in prejudice to Nannette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6345 - 2017-09-19
was deficient, his failure to introduce her condition to the jury did not result in prejudice to Nannette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6345 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
assessing Veloz’s motive in that he did not realize that in two instances he was shooting at police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51410 - 2010-06-28
assessing Veloz’s motive in that he did not realize that in two instances he was shooting at police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51410 - 2010-06-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
by No. 2009AP1314-CR 2 mistakenly assessing Veloz’s motive in that he did not realize that in two instances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51410 - 2014-09-15
by No. 2009AP1314-CR 2 mistakenly assessing Veloz’s motive in that he did not realize that in two instances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51410 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Frank J. Geniesse
that the warrantless entry did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We affirm. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9759 - 2017-09-19
that the warrantless entry did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We affirm. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9759 - 2017-09-19
Winnebago County Department of Human Services v. Nannette C.
was deficient, his failure to introduce her condition to the jury did not result in prejudice to Nannette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6345 - 2005-03-31
was deficient, his failure to introduce her condition to the jury did not result in prejudice to Nannette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6345 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sought to probate the 2005 will. Harvey contested the will, arguing that Floyd did not read, nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103684 - 2017-09-21
sought to probate the 2005 will. Harvey contested the will, arguing that Floyd did not read, nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103684 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that Floyd did not read, nor was he read, the contents of the will prior to signing the document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103684 - 2013-10-30
that Floyd did not read, nor was he read, the contents of the will prior to signing the document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103684 - 2013-10-30
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Eric A.
in her closing argument to the jury. We conclude that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18684 - 2005-06-22
in her closing argument to the jury. We conclude that the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18684 - 2005-06-22
[PDF]
Frontsheet
not impose any restitution award in this matter. Finally, because Attorney Ditter did not enter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343843 - 2021-03-09
not impose any restitution award in this matter. Finally, because Attorney Ditter did not enter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343843 - 2021-03-09