Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5061 - 5070 of 14321 for probate.
Search results 5061 - 5070 of 14321 for probate.
State v. Ronald D. Luttrell - 2007AP001840
to revocation-of-probation proceedings unless they are competent because although revocation of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32733 - 2008-06-24
to revocation-of-probation proceedings unless they are competent because although revocation of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32733 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
State v. Ronald D. Luttrell - 2007AP001840
may not be subject to revocation-of-probation proceedings unless they are competent because although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32733 - 2014-09-15
may not be subject to revocation-of-probation proceedings unless they are competent because although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32733 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Norman O. Brown - 1997AP001942
sixteen-year term of probation in the Woodman’s case, concurrent to the probationary sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12715 - 2017-09-21
sixteen-year term of probation in the Woodman’s case, concurrent to the probationary sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12715 - 2017-09-21
State v. Norman O. Brown - 1997AP001942
on the other counts in the Kohl’s case. The court imposed an additional sixteen-year term of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
on the other counts in the Kohl’s case. The court imposed an additional sixteen-year term of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman O. Brown - 1997AP001941
on the other counts in the Kohl’s case. The court imposed an additional sixteen-year term of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31
on the other counts in the Kohl’s case. The court imposed an additional sixteen-year term of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Norman O. Brown - 1997AP001941
sixteen-year term of probation in the Woodman’s case, concurrent to the probationary sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12714 - 2017-09-21
sixteen-year term of probation in the Woodman’s case, concurrent to the probationary sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12714 - 2017-09-21
Cynthia M. Stocking v. James Stocking - 1998AP001952
and its legal effect in the course of probate proceedings. We accepted interlocutory appeal by order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14236 - 2005-03-31
and its legal effect in the course of probate proceedings. We accepted interlocutory appeal by order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14236 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary L. Parson - 1997AP000116
. However, the latter sentence was stayed in favor of a five-year consecutive probation period. Parson has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11953 - 2005-03-31
. However, the latter sentence was stayed in favor of a five-year consecutive probation period. Parson has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11953 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Parson - 1997AP000116
consecutively. However, the latter sentence was stayed in favor of a five-year consecutive probation period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11953 - 2017-09-21
consecutively. However, the latter sentence was stayed in favor of a five-year consecutive probation period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11953 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Vernon L. Fink - 1994AP002365
they came back, Fink said he had his probation revoked and went to jail for a period of time. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8085 - 2017-09-19
they came back, Fink said he had his probation revoked and went to jail for a period of time. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8085 - 2017-09-19