Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5011 - 5020 of 66224 for did.
Search results 5011 - 5020 of 66224 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Chue Moua - 1996AP003243
was that Kia was sixteen years old in 1991 and therefore he did not violate § 948.02(1), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11685 - 2017-09-19
was that Kia was sixteen years old in 1991 and therefore he did not violate § 948.02(1), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11685 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Chue Moua - 1996AP003242
was that Kia was sixteen years old in 1991 and therefore he did not violate § 948.02(1), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11684 - 2017-09-19
was that Kia was sixteen years old in 1991 and therefore he did not violate § 948.02(1), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11684 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Frank E. Mallett - 2004AP000401
hearing; and (3) his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7304 - 2017-09-20
hearing; and (3) his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7304 - 2017-09-20
Harvest Savings Bank v. ROI Investments - 1998AP002320
in entering the judgment it did in order to prevent injustice to any of the parties. We further conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14374 - 2005-03-31
in entering the judgment it did in order to prevent injustice to any of the parties. We further conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14374 - 2005-03-31
State v. William D. Olson - 1994AP003247
and voluntarily; (2) the State did not breach the plea agreement; and (3) Olson was not denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8358 - 2005-03-31
and voluntarily; (2) the State did not breach the plea agreement; and (3) Olson was not denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8358 - 2005-03-31
State v. William D. Olson - 1994AP003246
and voluntarily; (2) the State did not breach the plea agreement; and (3) Olson was not denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8357 - 2005-03-31
and voluntarily; (2) the State did not breach the plea agreement; and (3) Olson was not denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8357 - 2005-03-31
State v. William D. Olson - 1994AP003248
and voluntarily; (2) the State did not breach the plea agreement; and (3) Olson was not denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8359 - 2005-03-31
and voluntarily; (2) the State did not breach the plea agreement; and (3) Olson was not denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8359 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Amy Jo Humphreys v. Roy G. Bridgeman - 1999AP002293
. Humphreys contends that the description of part of the property did not adequately identify the land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15937 - 2017-09-21
. Humphreys contends that the description of part of the property did not adequately identify the land
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15937 - 2017-09-21
State v. Vincente Murillo, Jr. - 1997AP000184
the weapon. He did not explain why the threats had not caused him to enter the plea earlier or how a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11982 - 2005-03-31
the weapon. He did not explain why the threats had not caused him to enter the plea earlier or how a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Vincente Murillo, Jr. - 1997AP000184
claimed to have obtained the weapon. He did not explain why the threats had not caused him to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11982 - 2017-09-21
claimed to have obtained the weapon. He did not explain why the threats had not caused him to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11982 - 2017-09-21