Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4931 - 4940 of 38639 for financial disclosure statement.

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Everett E. Wood - 2013AP001791
statement. ¶13 On March 21, 2012, the OLR wrote to Attorney Wood, requiring his written response
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124799 - 2014-10-20

State v. Darrick P. Jordan - 2009AP000416
right to disclosure of evidence is to evidence that is favorable to the accused, see Harris, 272 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42082 - 2009-10-13

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James T. Runyon - 2019AP001154
and the imposition of restitution as set forth herein. ¶10 On May 29, 2020, the OLR filed a restitution statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285680 - 2020-09-09

[PDF] State v. Nyrobi William Allen - 2015AP001190
to argue. Is that an accurate statement of what was requested at the time of the plea? [Trial Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168974 - 2017-09-21

Estate of Earl Lanzendorf v. Karen Shaw - 2008AP002482
statement of the law; we affirm the circuit court’s ruling on Timothy’s rebuttal testimony; and we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39397 - 2009-08-12

[PDF] Estate of Earl Lanzendorf v. Karen Shaw - 2008AP002482
instruction on donative intent was a correct statement of the law; we affirm the circuit court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39397 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] 22-03 - Petitioner's Response to Comments
the typical rental scenario as they involve disclosure of public governmental entity records. In Hagen v
/scrules/docs/2203_petitioners.pdf - 2022-09-12

Waterstone Bank SSB v. Kimberly A. Panenka - 2009AP001297
argues that WaterStone did not provide acceptable disclosure of her right to rescind because the bank’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51715 - 2010-07-06

[PDF] State v. Paul T. Rice - 2007AP000516
conclude the State showed good cause for its late disclosure that it intended to call the witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31271 - 2014-09-15

State v. Paul T. Rice - 2007AP000516
the State showed good cause for its late disclosure that it intended to call the witness, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31271 - 2008-02-27