Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 491 - 500 of 66218 for did.
Search results 491 - 500 of 66218 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Daniel F. Kratochwill - 1996AP000458
-CR -2- of the minimum period of incarceration for the offense and because he did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10390 - 2017-09-20
-CR -2- of the minimum period of incarceration for the offense and because he did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10390 - 2017-09-20
State v. Lavonn Macon - 2013AP002467
. § 974.06 (2011-12) motion for postconviction relief.[1] We conclude that Macon’s postconviction motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125288 - 2014-10-27
. § 974.06 (2011-12) motion for postconviction relief.[1] We conclude that Macon’s postconviction motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125288 - 2014-10-27
State v. Phillip C. Lamson - 1996AP000003
he never entered a plea. Further, Lamson argues that, if we conclude that he did enter a plea, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10189 - 2005-03-31
he never entered a plea. Further, Lamson argues that, if we conclude that he did enter a plea, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Phillip C. Lamson - 1996AP000003
, Lamson argues that, if we conclude that he did enter a plea, we should allow him to No. 96-0003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10189 - 2017-09-20
, Lamson argues that, if we conclude that he did enter a plea, we should allow him to No. 96-0003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10189 - 2017-09-20
Matthew Kulbiski v. Michael DeMarco - 2002AP001662
that Brian did not reside with Michael is supported by sufficient evidence, and Kulbiski waived his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5386 - 2005-03-31
that Brian did not reside with Michael is supported by sufficient evidence, and Kulbiski waived his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5386 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Matthew Kulbiski v. Michael DeMarco - 2002AP001662
of coverage, the jury’s finding that Brian did not reside with Michael is supported by sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5386 - 2017-09-19
of coverage, the jury’s finding that Brian did not reside with Michael is supported by sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5386 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jose G. Corpus - 2004AP000883
was involuntary as induced by a threat and that he did not understand the plea proceeding because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19314 - 2005-08-16
was involuntary as induced by a threat and that he did not understand the plea proceeding because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19314 - 2005-08-16
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark M. Ditter - 2020AP000148
not impose any restitution award in this matter. Finally, because Attorney Ditter did not enter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343843 - 2021-03-09
not impose any restitution award in this matter. Finally, because Attorney Ditter did not enter
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343843 - 2021-03-09
[PDF]
State v. Monika S. Lackershire - 2005AP001189
, she asserts that the circuit court did not explain the nature of read-in charges. Second, she argues
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29462 - 2014-09-15
, she asserts that the circuit court did not explain the nature of read-in charges. Second, she argues
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29462 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Frank J. Geniesse - 1995AP002716
that the warrantless entry did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We affirm. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9759 - 2017-09-19
that the warrantless entry did not violate the Fourth Amendment. We affirm. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9759 - 2017-09-19