Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 66224 for did.
Search results 4861 - 4870 of 66224 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Matthew Polster - 2004AP003268
did not request the court to instruct jurors that “[t]he act of sexual intercourse must be either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21512 - 2017-09-21
did not request the court to instruct jurors that “[t]he act of sexual intercourse must be either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21512 - 2017-09-21
State v. Matthew Polster - 2004AP003268
did not request the court to instruct jurors that “[t]he act of sexual intercourse must be either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21512 - 2006-02-22
did not request the court to instruct jurors that “[t]he act of sexual intercourse must be either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21512 - 2006-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Robert M. Anderson, Jr. - 2020AP002131
of counsel because counsel did not advise him that he could receive the maximum penalty. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448503 - 2021-11-02
of counsel because counsel did not advise him that he could receive the maximum penalty. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448503 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
? Did the trial court violate the defendant's constitutional rights and/or erroneously exercise its
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557370 - 2022-08-17
? Did the trial court violate the defendant's constitutional rights and/or erroneously exercise its
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=557370 - 2022-08-17
State v. David Arredondo - 2002AP002361
that Arredondo did not want to testify and that Arredondo’s decision was “99 percent definite” pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5626 - 2005-03-31
that Arredondo did not want to testify and that Arredondo’s decision was “99 percent definite” pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5626 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher Anson - 2003AP001444
the burden of showing that its use of the unlawfully obtained statements did not induce Anson's testimony
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18800 - 2005-06-28
the burden of showing that its use of the unlawfully obtained statements did not induce Anson's testimony
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18800 - 2005-06-28
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Nelis - 2005AP001920
erroneously admitted as prior inconsistent statements, that the State of Wisconsin (State) did not disclose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29150 - 2014-09-15
erroneously admitted as prior inconsistent statements, that the State of Wisconsin (State) did not disclose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29150 - 2014-09-15
State v. Samuel Nelis - 2005AP001920
(State) did not disclose such oral statements in advance, and further, that his right to confrontation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29150 - 2007-05-21
(State) did not disclose such oral statements in advance, and further, that his right to confrontation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29150 - 2007-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Raphael D. Turner, Jr. - 2017AP001348
did not have any drugs. Turner then asked to look inside Henry’s vehicle, and Henry told him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211854 - 2018-04-25
did not have any drugs. Turner then asked to look inside Henry’s vehicle, and Henry told him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211854 - 2018-04-25
[PDF]
State v. David M. Murrell - 1997AP001773
into the crowd. He said he did not see Owens at any time after the brief exchange in the bathroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12641 - 2017-09-21
into the crowd. He said he did not see Owens at any time after the brief exchange in the bathroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12641 - 2017-09-21