Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4811 - 4820 of 68463 for did.
Search results 4811 - 4820 of 68463 for did.
State v. Marshall R. Reese
cuts of cocaine. Reese claimed that the police did not have probable cause to stop the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2015-03-10
cuts of cocaine. Reese claimed that the police did not have probable cause to stop the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2015-03-10
[PDF]
Stacy S. v. Brian R.
the court did not make findings of fact or explain the reasoning for its exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4460 - 2017-09-19
the court did not make findings of fact or explain the reasoning for its exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4460 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Thomas W. Lantz v. Rosemary Cieslinski
, testified that Lantz did not stop at the intersection. Lantz testified that after he started
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8122 - 2017-09-19
, testified that Lantz did not stop at the intersection. Lantz testified that after he started
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8122 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles L., Sr.
that Charles: (1) never accompanied Joyce to the doctor when she was pregnant; (2) did not ask for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19042 - 2017-09-21
that Charles: (1) never accompanied Joyce to the doctor when she was pregnant; (2) did not ask for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19042 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable; and (4) the agency might reasonably make the decision it did based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118569 - 2012-01-30
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable; and (4) the agency might reasonably make the decision it did based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118569 - 2012-01-30
[PDF]
WI App 38
this story. (Emphasis added.) ¶6 The representation was not true; Coleman did not testify. In his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139400 - 2017-09-21
this story. (Emphasis added.) ¶6 The representation was not true; Coleman did not testify. In his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139400 - 2017-09-21
State v. Darcy N. K.
it did, and by failing to order that additional records be submitted for in camera review; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12092 - 2005-03-31
it did, and by failing to order that additional records be submitted for in camera review; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12092 - 2005-03-31
WI App 38 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP867-CR Complete Title ...
was not true; Coleman did not testify. In his closing argument, Coleman’s defense counsel did not take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139400 - 2015-05-28
was not true; Coleman did not testify. In his closing argument, Coleman’s defense counsel did not take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139400 - 2015-05-28
[PDF]
State v. Darcy N. K.
to disclose more of the records than it did, and by failing to order that additional records be submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12092 - 2017-09-21
to disclose more of the records than it did, and by failing to order that additional records be submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12092 - 2017-09-21
Jose-Manuel Raneda v. Bank of America, N.A.
notwithstanding the verdict because the Bank did not meet its burden of production as to the basic facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5547 - 2005-03-31
notwithstanding the verdict because the Bank did not meet its burden of production as to the basic facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5547 - 2005-03-31