Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4751 - 4760 of 38577 for indications.

[PDF] State v. Brian A. Schindler - 2015AP001312
, 163 Wis. 2d 241, 249-51 & n.6, 471 N.W.2d 599 (Ct. App. 1991). There is no indication of any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186507 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kyle R. Lutz - 2016AP002405
sentencing recommendation. However, during the hearing, Lutz did not present any testimony to indicate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206310 - 2017-12-26

State v. Kevin Wade Hobbs - 2012AP002227
of the crime to Hobbs, and trial counsel also indicated that the jury instructions listing the elements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97924 - 2013-06-04

[PDF] State v. Dequarius D. Fitzpatrick - 2015AP002437
indicated its intent to order a presentence investigation and offered Fitzpatrick the opportunity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171584 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Deterick - 2016AP001838
599 (Ct. App. 1991). There is no indication of any such defect here. Deterick entered his pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206303 - 2017-12-26

[PDF] State v. Terranzo Butler, Jr. - 2016AP002378
. The first victim, a woman carrying a two-year-old child, indicated that she did not have any property
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220427 - 2018-10-02

State v. Jeremy C. Trusty - 2008AP002117
contain written copies of jury instructions, which the State indicates are the instructions the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42481 - 2009-10-21

State v. Ronald E. Schroeder - 2008AP002810
argues Cassandra’s agreement he could keep the pictures he showed her indicates she retroactively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46961 - 2010-03-03

[PDF] State v. Ronald E. Schroeder - 2008AP002810
showed her indicates she retroactively consented to being photographed nude—or that it at least
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46961 - 2014-09-15

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lyle Paul Schaller - 2004AP002991
the client. ¶5 Attorney Schaller's law firm discovered his scheme after a client called indicating his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25072 - 2006-05-04