Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4711 - 4720 of 66224 for did.

[PDF] David Christian Ellestad v. Jennifer Susan Ellestad - 2018AP001298
at a church, earning $10.00 per hour. However, in the years leading up to the divorce, Jennifer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240746 - 2019-05-16

Tamara S. Heibler v. Department of Workforce Development - 2001AP000794
of Heibler’s request, therefore, did not constitute an interference with, restraint of, or denial of her rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3757 - 2005-03-31

State v. Todd Ennis - 2010AP002176
need and he did not feel he had to sign it.” According to Argall, Basinski told him he saw Kniess grab
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74904 - 2011-12-05

State v. William R. Hartman - 2011AP000622
the right to refuse to submit to the chemical test because the deputy sheriff who questioned him did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87250 - 2012-09-19

[PDF] State v. William R. Hartman - 2011AP000622
to the chemical test because the deputy sheriff who questioned him did not have a reasonable suspicion that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87250 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Warren A. Moffett - 2006AP000959
of Moffett’s arguments in turn. ¶5 In order to establish that he or she did not receive effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28567 - 2014-09-15

State v. Warren A. Moffett - 2006AP000959
of Moffett’s arguments in turn. ¶5 In order to establish that he or she did not receive effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28567 - 2007-03-26

State v. Tyshion D. Davis - 2004AP002418
circumstances did not constitute the prejudice necessary to maintain an ineffective assistance claim. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26565 - 2006-09-25

[PDF] State v. Tyshion D. Davis - 2004AP002418
circumstances did not constitute the prejudice necessary to maintain an ineffective assistance claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26565 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David K. - 2006AP003032
to re-open the default hearing. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30305 - 2014-09-15