Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 471 - 480 of 63340 for b's.

[PDF] State v. Alan L. Radke - 2001AP001879
. No. 01-1879-CR 2 of being a persistent repeater under Wis. Stat. § 939.62(2m)(a)1m., (b)2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16525 - 2017-09-21

State v. Alan L. Radke - 2001AP001879
under Wis. Stat. § 939.62(2m)(a)1m., (b)2., and (c), commonly known as Wisconsin's "two strikes" law.[2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16525 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Marathon County v. D. K. - 2017AP002217
was dangerous as defined under Wis. Stat. § 51.20(1)(a)2.b. (2015-16).3 The County disagrees, and also
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253508 - 2020-02-04

HSBC Realty Credit Corporation v. City of Glendale - 2005AP001042
, Touchdown, Inc., d/b/a Pro Image, Mutual Savings Bank, Tumbleweed/Diamondback Management, Nautilus
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29685 - 2007-07-10

[PDF] HSBC Realty Credit Corporation v. City of Glendale - 2005AP001042
#433, Luxottica Retail Group, Touchdown, Inc., d/b/a Pro Image, Mutual Savings Bank, Tumbleweed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29685 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule Petition 18-06
Supreme Court Rules (SCR) 60.05(8)(b) and SCR 60.07(2) PETITION 18-____ Diane M
/supreme/docs/1806petition.pdf - 2018-11-12

[PDF] 2023 deposit/bail/bond schedule
a Municipal court cost totals are provided at the back of the book. b An additional $3.50 is added
/publications/fees/docs/bondsched23_2.pdf - 2023-07-11

[PDF] 2023 deposit/bail/bond schedule
a Municipal court cost totals are provided at the back of the book. b An additional $3.50 is added
/publications/fees/docs/bondsched23_1.pdf - 2023-01-03

[PDF] 2024 deposit/bail/bond schedule
cost totals are provided at the back of the book. b An additional $3.50 is added for violations
/publications/fees/docs/bondsched24.pdf - 2024-09-19

J. Denis Moran v. Wisconsin Department of Administration and Mark D. Bugher - 1998AP003008
judgment declaring that the salary cap provision of § 20.923(15)(b), Stats., does not apply to judicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14661 - 2005-03-31