Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4631 - 4640 of 66224 for did.
Search results 4631 - 4640 of 66224 for did.
State v. Paul J. Stuart - 2001AP001345
that trial counsel’s representation did not prejudice Stuart or require a new trial. ¶6 Stuart first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3975 - 2005-03-31
that trial counsel’s representation did not prejudice Stuart or require a new trial. ¶6 Stuart first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3975 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stacy S. v. Brian R. - 2001AP002686
the court did not make findings of fact or explain the reasoning for its exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4460 - 2017-09-19
the court did not make findings of fact or explain the reasoning for its exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4460 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dane County Planning & Development v. Greg Griswold - 2009AP001594
prejudice at a hearing in a companion case, and the circuit court did not provide a record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52098 - 2014-09-15
prejudice at a hearing in a companion case, and the circuit court did not provide a record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52098 - 2014-09-15
State v. Roderick Lashawn Bogan - 2004AP002726
recommendation, and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Because the prosecutor did not breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20554 - 2005-12-12
recommendation, and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Because the prosecutor did not breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20554 - 2005-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Roderick Lashawn Bogan - 2004AP002726
. Because the prosecutor did not breach the plea agreement, and Bogan has failed to demonstrate that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20554 - 2017-09-21
. Because the prosecutor did not breach the plea agreement, and Bogan has failed to demonstrate that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20554 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Wa Thao Lor - 1996AP000771
sixteenth birthday. Kuehn indicated that she did not believe A. H. was being truthful in her courtroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10555 - 2017-09-20
sixteenth birthday. Kuehn indicated that she did not believe A. H. was being truthful in her courtroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10555 - 2017-09-20
State v. Wa Thao Lor - 1996AP000771
after her sixteenth birthday. Kuehn indicated that she did not believe A. H. was being truthful in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10555 - 2005-03-31
after her sixteenth birthday. Kuehn indicated that she did not believe A. H. was being truthful in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10555 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cynthia S. - 2002AP003009
] must allege that in fact he [or she] did not know or understand the information that should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5881 - 2005-03-31
] must allege that in fact he [or she] did not know or understand the information that should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5881 - 2005-03-31
County of Langlade v. Michael N. Kaster - 1995AP002694
prior notice of the repairs. County forestry employees testified they did not recall ever brushing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9748 - 2005-03-31
prior notice of the repairs. County forestry employees testified they did not recall ever brushing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9748 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Parish D. Perkins - 1998AP001677
counsel because this court directed him to No. 98-1677-CR 3 proceed pro se and he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14137 - 2014-09-15
counsel because this court directed him to No. 98-1677-CR 3 proceed pro se and he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14137 - 2014-09-15