Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 461 - 470 of 20758 for warrants.
Search results 461 - 470 of 20758 for warrants.
[PDF]
State v. Edison J. Busanet-Perez - 2011AP001671
to challenge the probable cause basis for the search warrant.”2 (Bolding omitted.) Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85153 - 2014-09-15
to challenge the probable cause basis for the search warrant.”2 (Bolding omitted.) Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85153 - 2014-09-15
State v. Edison J. Busanet-Perez - 2011AP001671
the probable cause basis for the search warrant.”[2] (Bolding omitted.) Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85153 - 2012-07-23
the probable cause basis for the search warrant.”[2] (Bolding omitted.) Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85153 - 2012-07-23
State v. Clifton D. Harris - 2006AP001430
the execution of a search warrant. Harris seeks remand for a Franks[2] hearing on whether police misled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29087 - 2007-05-16
the execution of a search warrant. Harris seeks remand for a Franks[2] hearing on whether police misled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29087 - 2007-05-16
[PDF]
State v. Clifton D. Harris - 2006AP001430
the execution of a search warrant. Harris seeks remand for a Franks2 hearing on whether police misled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29087 - 2014-09-15
the execution of a search warrant. Harris seeks remand for a Franks2 hearing on whether police misled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29087 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Cedric Leon Barefield, Jr. - 2007AP001283
was staying should have been suppressed because police did not have a search warrant. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33833 - 2014-09-15
was staying should have been suppressed because police did not have a search warrant. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33833 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk - 2000AP001057
because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s arrest does not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s arrest does not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2510 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk - 2000AP001055
because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s arrest does not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2509 - 2017-09-19
because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s arrest does not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2509 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk - 2000AP001059
because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s arrest does not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s arrest does not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2511 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Israel Saldana - 1996AP002886
staleness of a search warrant. We affirm the judgment and the order. Saldana was convicted for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11532 - 2017-09-19
staleness of a search warrant. We affirm the judgment and the order. Saldana was convicted for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11532 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Roosevelt Manuel - 1996AP002427
the basis for the arrest warrant recklessly omitted information that, if included, would have led
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19
the basis for the arrest warrant recklessly omitted information that, if included, would have led
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11314 - 2017-09-19