Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 461 - 470 of 66218 for did.
Search results 461 - 470 of 66218 for did.
[PDF]
Robert W. Ganley v. Department of Corrections - 1997AP001302
decision to revoke were not arbitrary and capricious; (2) the Department did not violate Ganley’s right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12440 - 2017-09-21
decision to revoke were not arbitrary and capricious; (2) the Department did not violate Ganley’s right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12440 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Samuel L. Hogan - 1996AP002829
, Clarke did not believe her. Clarke testified that after he had sex with Lulu, he went to sleep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11514 - 2017-09-19
, Clarke did not believe her. Clarke testified that after he had sex with Lulu, he went to sleep
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11514 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anthony S. Sims - 2006AP002696
and conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying the motion without a hearing. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30231 - 2014-09-15
and conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying the motion without a hearing. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30231 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony S. Sims - 2006AP002696
reconsideration request. We reach the merits and conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30231 - 2007-09-11
reconsideration request. We reach the merits and conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30231 - 2007-09-11
[PDF]
State v. Dahir N. Evans - 2008AP001173
that the prospective application of the above rule did not affect the other parts of the original opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36522 - 2014-09-15
that the prospective application of the above rule did not affect the other parts of the original opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36522 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eugene E. Volk - 2000AP001059
on the ground that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
on the ground that the State did not comply with the time limit for bringing him to trial established in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Marlo U. Morales - 2005AP000171
the trial court did not err in summarily denying Morales’s motion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19876 - 2017-09-21
the trial court did not err in summarily denying Morales’s motion, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19876 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Panda Properties LLC v. Michael Pitcock - 2011AP001836
cases, the owners did not appear at the summary judgment hearing, and the circuit court granted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95823 - 2014-09-15
cases, the owners did not appear at the summary judgment hearing, and the circuit court granted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95823 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Larry M. Presby - 2006AP001837
of the jurors did not hear, or chose not to listen to, material portions of the trial. Specifically, Presby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29151 - 2014-09-15
of the jurors did not hear, or chose not to listen to, material portions of the trial. Specifically, Presby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29151 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry M. Presby - 2006AP001837
have granted his motion for a mistrial based on his assertion that one of the jurors did not hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29151 - 2007-05-21
have granted his motion for a mistrial based on his assertion that one of the jurors did not hear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29151 - 2007-05-21