Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 68445 for did.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 68445 for did.
State v. Kurt A. Loewen
were not entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently because he did not understand that a mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8209 - 2005-03-31
were not entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently because he did not understand that a mere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8209 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martwon Brown
to file a direct appeal. He also claims that: (1) the trial court did not have personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24741 - 2006-04-10
to file a direct appeal. He also claims that: (1) the trial court did not have personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24741 - 2006-04-10
State v. Levelt D. Musgraves
of reasons, the only reason he asserts on this appeal is that Love did not stick with Musgraves's contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9121 - 2005-03-31
of reasons, the only reason he asserts on this appeal is that Love did not stick with Musgraves's contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9121 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gilberto Flores
motion arguing that his pleas were not constitutionally taken because he did not understand the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9864 - 2017-09-19
motion arguing that his pleas were not constitutionally taken because he did not understand the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9864 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lawrence J. Gaston
the victim’s description of the assault. We conclude that the police officer’s comments did not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16284 - 2005-03-31
the victim’s description of the assault. We conclude that the police officer’s comments did not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16284 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Sawyer County Board of Appeals
for the Padilla Family Trust based on the fact that in 1993 when they did own the property, at that time it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5380 - 2017-09-19
for the Padilla Family Trust based on the fact that in 1993 when they did own the property, at that time it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5380 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, noting that a transcript was unavailable at the time. The jury also asked, “Did the defendant say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60569 - 2011-02-28
, noting that a transcript was unavailable at the time. The jury also asked, “Did the defendant say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60569 - 2011-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS
offense. Jackson argues: (1) that the circuit court erred in ruling that he did not have standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109390 - 2014-03-24
offense. Jackson argues: (1) that the circuit court erred in ruling that he did not have standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109390 - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
revocation decision in December 1998. Celske did not timely file a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27129 - 2014-09-15
revocation decision in December 1998. Celske did not timely file a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27129 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
did not timely file a petition for a writ of certiorari in the circuit court to review the probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27129 - 2006-11-14
did not timely file a petition for a writ of certiorari in the circuit court to review the probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27129 - 2006-11-14