Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4541 - 4550 of 68446 for did.

State v. Martwon Brown
to file a direct appeal. He also claims that: (1) the trial court did not have personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24741 - 2006-04-10

[PDF] State v. Gilberto Flores
motion arguing that his pleas were not constitutionally taken because he did not understand the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9864 - 2017-09-19

State v. Larry D. Hicks
conduct within seventy-two hours of the disorderly conduct incident. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18372 - 2005-06-06

[PDF] Exactech, Inc. v. Terex Cranes, Inc.
that the original No. 2004AP2203 2 contract period did not expire on the two-year anniversary date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18875 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
revocation decision in December 1998. Celske did not timely file a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27129 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
did not timely file a petition for a writ of certiorari in the circuit court to review the probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27129 - 2006-11-14

State v. Douglas T. Meyer
: (1) the State did not follow the procedure set out in Wis. Stat. § 971.09[1] when it consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3811 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lawrence J. Gaston
the victim’s description of the assault. We conclude that the police officer’s comments did not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16284 - 2005-03-31

State v. Levelt D. Musgraves
of reasons, the only reason he asserts on this appeal is that Love did not stick with Musgraves's contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9121 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bobby D. Swift
and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in instructing the jury, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10685 - 2017-09-20