Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4521 - 4530 of 68463 for did.
Search results 4521 - 4530 of 68463 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at Taylor’s lawyer’s office to this effect. K.B. did not appear as a witness on the date that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174534 - 2017-09-21
at Taylor’s lawyer’s office to this effect. K.B. did not appear as a witness on the date that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174534 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Pluemer
. The trial court never expressly ruled on the judicial notice issue, but it did rely on the preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2193 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court never expressly ruled on the judicial notice issue, but it did rely on the preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2193 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James C. Dillard, Sr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
appears to argue that the prison officials did not comply with agency rules because the corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4857 - 2017-09-19
appears to argue that the prison officials did not comply with agency rules because the corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4857 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish that he was entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68324 - 2014-09-15
of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish that he was entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68324 - 2014-09-15
State v. Devin D. Lenoir
) the prosecutor failed to timely disclose the status of the prosecution against his accomplice, (4) the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12625 - 2013-11-07
) the prosecutor failed to timely disclose the status of the prosecution against his accomplice, (4) the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12625 - 2013-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
the personal representative of the estate, he did not have standing to bring this action. Schmidt stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35528 - 2009-02-11
the personal representative of the estate, he did not have standing to bring this action. Schmidt stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35528 - 2009-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
of the same individuals, it did not deem this matter “particularly damaging.” The circuit court disagreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25
of the same individuals, it did not deem this matter “particularly damaging.” The circuit court disagreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25
State v. Bobby D. Swift
conviction and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in instructing the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10685 - 2005-03-31
conviction and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in instructing the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10685 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven C. Wizner
erroneous. See id. Wizner argues that the trial court did not advise him and he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12183 - 2005-03-31
erroneous. See id. Wizner argues that the trial court did not advise him and he did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12183 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and Vang. The victim did not report the assaults until Vang moved out of the house, about a year after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95339 - 2013-04-10
and Vang. The victim did not report the assaults until Vang moved out of the house, about a year after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95339 - 2013-04-10