Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 451 - 460 of 68466 for did.
Search results 451 - 460 of 68466 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 that the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress because the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82806 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 that the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress because the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82806 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Because Chapman did not file and serve a proper summons on the defendants, the circuit court lacked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240543 - 2019-05-15
Because Chapman did not file and serve a proper summons on the defendants, the circuit court lacked
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240543 - 2019-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecutor’s sentencing remarks did not breach the plea agreement, we affirm. ¶2 At the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103931 - 2013-11-12
the prosecutor’s sentencing remarks did not breach the plea agreement, we affirm. ¶2 At the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103931 - 2013-11-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle and therefore the circuit court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38611 - 2014-09-15
officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle and therefore the circuit court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38611 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the prosecutor’s sentencing remarks did not breach the plea agreement, we affirm. ¶2 At the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103931 - 2017-09-21
the prosecutor’s sentencing remarks did not breach the plea agreement, we affirm. ¶2 At the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103931 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
moved to have the 2004 conviction excluded on the ground that he did not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168846 - 2017-09-21
moved to have the 2004 conviction excluded on the ground that he did not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168846 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 802.05 (2005-06)[1] did not apply retroactively to this case and, if the new statute did apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32016 - 2008-03-05
. Stat. § 802.05 (2005-06)[1] did not apply retroactively to this case and, if the new statute did apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32016 - 2008-03-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
concluded the provisions of No. 2006AP2394 2 the new WIS. STAT. § 802.05 (2005-06)1 did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32016 - 2014-09-15
concluded the provisions of No. 2006AP2394 2 the new WIS. STAT. § 802.05 (2005-06)1 did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32016 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a sufficient reason as to why he did not raise an ineffective assistance of counsel argument in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85107 - 2012-07-24
a sufficient reason as to why he did not raise an ineffective assistance of counsel argument in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85107 - 2012-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective. As Sheriff has not provided a sufficient reason as to why he did not raise an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85107 - 2014-09-15
was ineffective. As Sheriff has not provided a sufficient reason as to why he did not raise an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85107 - 2014-09-15