Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4491 - 4500 of 68458 for did.
Search results 4491 - 4500 of 68458 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial because of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68324 - 2011-07-20
is entitled to a new trial because of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68324 - 2011-07-20
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Pluemer
. The trial court never expressly ruled on the judicial notice issue, but it did rely on the preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2193 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court never expressly ruled on the judicial notice issue, but it did rely on the preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2193 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
as a party to a crime. He argued that during the plea colloquy he did not understand what was meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32492 - 2008-04-21
as a party to a crime. He argued that during the plea colloquy he did not understand what was meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32492 - 2008-04-21
James Kasieta v. James Tennies
property for the required twenty years. We conclude that they did not, and therefore affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3398 - 2005-03-31
property for the required twenty years. We conclude that they did not, and therefore affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3398 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-defense, did not have a significant criminal record, and had a full-time job. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
-defense, did not have a significant criminal record, and had a full-time job. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
because counsel did not pursue a defense of voluntary intoxication and because counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24497 - 2017-09-21
because counsel did not pursue a defense of voluntary intoxication and because counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24497 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
as a party to a crime. He argued that during the plea colloquy he did not understand what was meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32492 - 2014-09-15
as a party to a crime. He argued that during the plea colloquy he did not understand what was meant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32492 - 2014-09-15
State v. Larry N. Henkel
signifies that the court did find that the Dodge County conviction was a new factor. If there was no new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12465 - 2005-03-31
signifies that the court did find that the Dodge County conviction was a new factor. If there was no new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12465 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: the court did not address Christopher’s claim that he was not fully credited for the $400 deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
: the court did not address Christopher’s claim that he was not fully credited for the $400 deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
colloquy was deficient because the circuit court did not advise him that the State would have to prove
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157937 - 2017-09-21
colloquy was deficient because the circuit court did not advise him that the State would have to prove
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157937 - 2017-09-21