Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4431 - 4440 of 68445 for did.
Search results 4431 - 4440 of 68445 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: the court did not address Christopher’s claim that he was not fully credited for the $400 deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
: the court did not address Christopher’s claim that he was not fully credited for the $400 deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Dane v. James V. Buchanan
. No. 94-2175 -2- (1) Did the trial court err when it determined that the sheriff's deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8023 - 2017-09-19
. No. 94-2175 -2- (1) Did the trial court err when it determined that the sheriff's deputy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8023 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-defense, did not have a significant criminal record, and had a full-time job. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
-defense, did not have a significant criminal record, and had a full-time job. The postconviction court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
colloquy was deficient because the circuit court did not advise him that the State would have to prove
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157937 - 2017-09-21
colloquy was deficient because the circuit court did not advise him that the State would have to prove
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157937 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial because of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68324 - 2011-07-20
is entitled to a new trial because of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68324 - 2011-07-20
[PDF]
State v. Kevin L. Guibord
from the case when Guibord indicated he did not want to be represented by counsel. 2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14230 - 2014-09-15
from the case when Guibord indicated he did not want to be represented by counsel. 2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14230 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Devin D. Lenoir
did not have sufficient evidence to convict him, and (5) as a result of these and other factors, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12625 - 2017-09-21
did not have sufficient evidence to convict him, and (5) as a result of these and other factors, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12625 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey A. Pluemer
on the judicial notice issue, but it did rely on the preliminary hearing testimony when it found that Pluemer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2193 - 2005-03-31
on the judicial notice issue, but it did rely on the preliminary hearing testimony when it found that Pluemer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2193 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to pay child support for the couple’s two children. Michael did not personally appear at the temporary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119515 - 2014-08-18
to pay child support for the couple’s two children. Michael did not personally appear at the temporary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119515 - 2014-08-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
of initial confinement and fourteen years of extended supervision. Harris did not file a direct appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28100 - 2014-09-15
of initial confinement and fourteen years of extended supervision. Harris did not file a direct appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28100 - 2014-09-15