Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4411 - 4420 of 16013 for search wicourts.gov.
Search results 4411 - 4420 of 16013 for search wicourts.gov.
[PDF]
State v. Courtney C. Brown - 2017AP000774
to a search of Brown’s person after the officer wrote a warning ticket. Brown contends that the requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241571 - 2019-10-04
to a search of Brown’s person after the officer wrote a warning ticket. Brown contends that the requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241571 - 2019-10-04
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence A. Williams - 2001AP000463
a consent search of a vehicle, and the issue is whether the driver was "seized" for purposes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16479 - 2017-09-21
a consent search of a vehicle, and the issue is whether the driver was "seized" for purposes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16479 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Antwon C. Mathews - 2001AP000464
a consent search of a vehicle, and the issue is whether the driver was "seized" for purposes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16480 - 2017-09-21
a consent search of a vehicle, and the issue is whether the driver was "seized" for purposes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16480 - 2017-09-21
Village of Little Chute v. Ronald A. Rosin - 2013AP002536
a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, and, therefore, he argues the quantum of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108271 - 2014-02-24
a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, and, therefore, he argues the quantum of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108271 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Hallet - 2009AP000292
suppression motion, we affirm the judgment. ¶2 Consent is an exception to the rule that warrantless searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49114 - 2014-09-15
suppression motion, we affirm the judgment. ¶2 Consent is an exception to the rule that warrantless searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49114 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Frederick S. Burger - 2015AP001210
a warrant to search Burger’s residence for evidence of drug dealing. The application for the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170175 - 2017-09-21
a warrant to search Burger’s residence for evidence of drug dealing. The application for the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Frankie Groenke - 2006AP001712
. Krenzke testified that the police then got a search warrant and searched Groenke’s house: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28680 - 2014-09-15
. Krenzke testified that the police then got a search warrant and searched Groenke’s house: Q
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28680 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lance D. Pelky - 2004AP002220
motion to suppress the marijuana seized during a pat-down search performed by officer James Schaut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17656 - 2017-09-21
motion to suppress the marijuana seized during a pat-down search performed by officer James Schaut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17656 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to suppress evidence obtained from his phone, which was seized and then searched pursuant to a warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758891 - 2024-02-08
to suppress evidence obtained from his phone, which was seized and then searched pursuant to a warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758891 - 2024-02-08
[PDF]
State v. James Lanzel - 1994AP003201
James Lanzel. Based on our review of the affidavit and the search warrant, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8339 - 2017-09-19
James Lanzel. Based on our review of the affidavit and the search warrant, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8339 - 2017-09-19