Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 441 - 450 of 66218 for did.
Search results 441 - 450 of 66218 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Alvernice O. Sellers - 2003AP001951
for resentencing on all counts. ¶2 Sellers raises several issues on appeal that he did not raise in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6698 - 2017-09-20
for resentencing on all counts. ¶2 Sellers raises several issues on appeal that he did not raise in the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6698 - 2017-09-20
State v. Alvernice O. Sellers - 2003AP001951
. ¶2 Sellers raises several issues on appeal that he did not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6698 - 2005-03-31
. ¶2 Sellers raises several issues on appeal that he did not raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6698 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bradley M. Belisle - 1996AP000444
be confined to his home and return for sentencing on April 11, 1995. However, Belisle apparently did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10382 - 2017-09-20
be confined to his home and return for sentencing on April 11, 1995. However, Belisle apparently did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10382 - 2017-09-20
State v. Antion Demanuel Delarosa - 2013AP002019
be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not adequately review the constitutional rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09
be allowed to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did not adequately review the constitutional rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09
Carlos Frum v. Lee I. Wigod - 1996AP000404
of Wisconsin. At the October 7 closing, Wigod did not reveal that he had commenced a bankruptcy case. He paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10366 - 2005-03-31
of Wisconsin. At the October 7 closing, Wigod did not reveal that he had commenced a bankruptcy case. He paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10366 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bryce C. Nelson - 1999AP001849
on the basis that Dacko did not have actual authority to consent to a search of his room and that Golden did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15752 - 2005-03-31
on the basis that Dacko did not have actual authority to consent to a search of his room and that Golden did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15752 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Susan C. Macho - 2011AP001841
-CR 2 that the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress because the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82806 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 that the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress because the officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82806 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Chavis T. Sheriff - 2011AP001202
was ineffective. As Sheriff has not provided a sufficient reason as to why he did not raise an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85107 - 2014-09-15
was ineffective. As Sheriff has not provided a sufficient reason as to why he did not raise an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85107 - 2014-09-15
State v. Chavis T. Sheriff - 2011AP001202
a sufficient reason as to why he did not raise an ineffective assistance of counsel argument in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85107 - 2012-07-24
a sufficient reason as to why he did not raise an ineffective assistance of counsel argument in response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85107 - 2012-07-24
State v. Susan C. Macho - 2011AP001841
in denying her motion to suppress because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to seize her.[2] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22
in denying her motion to suppress because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to seize her.[2] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22