Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4301 - 4310 of 66224 for did.
Search results 4301 - 4310 of 66224 for did.
[PDF]
Kenosha County DC&FS v. M.A.C. - 2023AP002068
was not entitled to relief on her ineffective assistance claim, the circuit court did not err in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802286 - 2024-05-14
was not entitled to relief on her ineffective assistance claim, the circuit court did not err in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=802286 - 2024-05-14
State v. Lance Donelle Butler, Jr. - 2014AP001769
was required to give this information and the officers did not qualify as expert witnesses. Butler also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142883 - 2015-06-08
was required to give this information and the officers did not qualify as expert witnesses. Butler also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142883 - 2015-06-08
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Spizzirri - 2015AP000084
be impaired.” ¶8 At trial, Koepnick and Knutsen testified for the State. Spizzirri did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157895 - 2017-09-21
be impaired.” ¶8 At trial, Koepnick and Knutsen testified for the State. Spizzirri did not testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157895 - 2017-09-21
Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company - 2003AP001415
, the County contended that § 81.15 plainly did not apply because the County’s agreement to maintain Highway 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6524 - 2005-03-31
, the County contended that § 81.15 plainly did not apply because the County’s agreement to maintain Highway 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6524 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald A. Thompson v. Lacrosse County Board of Adjustment - 1994AP002281
the following issues: (1) Did the circuit court erroneously exercise its discretion when it refused to take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8062 - 2017-09-19
the following issues: (1) Did the circuit court erroneously exercise its discretion when it refused to take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8062 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brandy C. Arneson - 2001AP001837
, the arresting officer did not “seize” Arneson when he asked for consent to search her car, and therefore, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4157 - 2005-03-31
, the arresting officer did not “seize” Arneson when he asked for consent to search her car, and therefore, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4157 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael S. Eisenga v. Clare A. Eisenga - 2013AP000091
floor provision, and also found that the child support floor provision did not violate public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102554 - 2017-09-21
floor provision, and also found that the child support floor provision did not violate public policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102554 - 2017-09-21
Michael S. Eisenga v. Clare A. Eisenga - 2013AP000091
support floor provision did not violate public policy. The circuit court refused to modify Michael’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102554 - 2013-10-07
support floor provision did not violate public policy. The circuit court refused to modify Michael’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102554 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
State v. Stacey-Terrill Broadway - 2020AP000214
of unfair prejudice. As such, the court did not err by allowing the State to introduce the images
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330666 - 2021-02-02
of unfair prejudice. As such, the court did not err by allowing the State to introduce the images
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330666 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
James Ripp v. Thomas P. Sayre - 2006AP001102
at that time, the notice was not within the time period required by the lease and the Sayres did not waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27640 - 2014-09-15
at that time, the notice was not within the time period required by the lease and the Sayres did not waive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27640 - 2014-09-15