Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4281 - 4290 of 64690 for b's.

Caryl Sprague v. City of Madison
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O'BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8261 - 2005-03-31

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Teresita J.
” is a question of law which we determine de novo. Cf. Joni B. v. State, 202 Wis.2d 1, 12, 549 N.W.2d 411, 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12197 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thomas H. Bush
standard under § 980.06(2)(b), STATS., because it failed to consider the least restrictive alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13315 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mark Anthony Adell v. Judy Smith
the requirements set forth in WIS. STAT. § 802.05(3)(b)4. This section provides that the court shall dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2125 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. During that discussion, the trial court referenced the “keys to the door” rule, established in Carla B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218914 - 2018-09-18

[PDF] Eugene Makowka v. Kim Dobner
, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Racine County: ALLAN B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25132 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to WIS. STAT. § 23.33(4)(b) and corresponding local ordinances. Dimmick argues, generally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=900801 - 2025-01-14

[PDF] Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr
. § 814.025(3)(b) (2001-02).1 Morters also appeals from the judgment awarding $20,000 to the defendants.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5653 - 2017-09-19

Eugene Makowka v. Kim Dobner
of the circuit court for Racine County: Allan B. torhorst, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25132 - 2006-05-16

[PDF] NOTICE
. § 804.11(1)(b), the requests should be deemed admitted. The court decided not to rule on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31959 - 2014-09-15