Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4181 - 4190 of 63358 for b's.
Search results 4181 - 4190 of 63358 for b's.
Caryl Sprague v. City of Madison - 1994AP002983
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O'BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8261 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O'BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Duncan LaPlant - 1994AP002362
. ADM. CODE § ATCP 134.04(2)(b)(1)-(4), is unconstitutionally vague; and (3) WIS. ADM. CODE Chapter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8084 - 2017-09-19
. ADM. CODE § ATCP 134.04(2)(b)(1)-(4), is unconstitutionally vague; and (3) WIS. ADM. CODE Chapter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8084 - 2017-09-19
State v. Duncan LaPlant - 1994AP002362
134.04(2)(b)(1)-(4), is unconstitutionally vague; and (3) Wis. Adm. Code Chapter ATCP 134, violates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8084 - 2005-03-31
134.04(2)(b)(1)-(4), is unconstitutionally vague; and (3) Wis. Adm. Code Chapter ATCP 134, violates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8084 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gage Inc., LLP v. Village of Sister Bay - 2010AP001778
was located in the “B-3 Downtown Business District,” adjacent to property owned by the Village president
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67345 - 2014-09-15
was located in the “B-3 Downtown Business District,” adjacent to property owned by the Village president
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67345 - 2014-09-15
Gage Inc., LLP v. Village of Sister Bay - 2010AP001778
. The proposed project was located in the “B-3 Downtown Business District,” adjacent to property owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67345 - 2011-07-05
. The proposed project was located in the “B-3 Downtown Business District,” adjacent to property owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67345 - 2011-07-05
[PDF]
State v. Virtis A. - 2003AP001860
. § 48.415(1)(b) (“Incidental contact between parent and child shall not prevent the court from finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20
. § 48.415(1)(b) (“Incidental contact between parent and child shall not prevent the court from finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
K. M. v. R. O. - 2018AP001206
. During that discussion, the trial court referenced the “keys to the door” rule, established in Carla B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218914 - 2018-09-18
. During that discussion, the trial court referenced the “keys to the door” rule, established in Carla B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218914 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
State v. Scott F. Ferguson - 2018AP001651
of a firearm by an adjudicated delinquent. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.01(1)(a), 939.63(1)(b), and 941.29(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245334 - 2019-08-20
of a firearm by an adjudicated delinquent. See WIS. STAT. §§ 940.01(1)(a), 939.63(1)(b), and 941.29(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245334 - 2019-08-20
Mark Anthony Adell v. Judy Smith - 2000AP000070
Adell’s certiorari petition satisfied the requirements set forth in Wis. Stat. § 802.05(3)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2125 - 2005-03-31
Adell’s certiorari petition satisfied the requirements set forth in Wis. Stat. § 802.05(3)(b)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2125 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Chute v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company - 2006AP001499
statutes, the language now found in paragraph (5)(d) was part of § 632.32(2)(b) (1977). Paragraph (2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27963 - 2014-09-15
statutes, the language now found in paragraph (5)(d) was part of § 632.32(2)(b) (1977). Paragraph (2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27963 - 2014-09-15