Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4161 - 4170 of 16013 for search wicourts.gov.
Search results 4161 - 4170 of 16013 for search wicourts.gov.
State v. Dwayne Williams - 1996AP002817
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J.M. - 1998AP001048
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David J.M. - 1998AP001048
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daryl Howard - 2006AP001227
discovered the baton in the course of a protective search of Howard’s person and vehicle. Howard argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
discovered the baton in the course of a protective search of Howard’s person and vehicle. Howard argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Daryl Howard - 2006AP001227
search of Howard’s person and vehicle. Howard argues that evidence seized from his vehicle should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30244 - 2014-09-15
search of Howard’s person and vehicle. Howard argues that evidence seized from his vehicle should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30244 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jerry C.O. - 1996AP002232
if they could search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31
if they could search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jerry C.O. - 1996AP002232
search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer Gary Cole testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11213 - 2017-09-19
search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer Gary Cole testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11213 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ronnie J. Frayer - 2000AP001081
that the ensuing searches of the attic and the apartment were invalid. We also reject the State’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2521 - 2017-09-19
that the ensuing searches of the attic and the apartment were invalid. We also reject the State’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2521 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Matthew J. Trecroci - 2000AP001079
that the ensuing searches of the attic and the apartment were invalid. We also reject the State’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2519 - 2017-09-19
that the ensuing searches of the attic and the apartment were invalid. We also reject the State’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2519 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Amy L. Wicks - 2000AP001083
that the ensuing searches of the attic and the apartment were invalid. We also reject the State’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2523 - 2017-09-19
that the ensuing searches of the attic and the apartment were invalid. We also reject the State’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2523 - 2017-09-19