Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 411 - 420 of 20758 for warrants.
Search results 411 - 420 of 20758 for warrants.
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Smith - 2016AP001513
not challenge the second search warrant No. 2016AP1513-CR 2 issued in this case under Franks v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194017 - 2017-09-21
not challenge the second search warrant No. 2016AP1513-CR 2 issued in this case under Franks v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Andrew Anton Sabo - 2017AP002289
the execution of a search warrant should have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of the warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233638 - 2019-01-29
the execution of a search warrant should have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of the warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233638 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
State v. Donnie Gene Richards - 2017AP000043
not be sufficient time to obtain a search warrant for a blood draw. Blood was drawn from Richards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270023 - 2020-09-14
not be sufficient time to obtain a search warrant for a blood draw. Blood was drawn from Richards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270023 - 2020-09-14
State v. Eugene E. Volk - 2000AP001059
that the IAD does not apply because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
that the IAD does not apply because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene E. Volk - 2000AP001055
that the IAD does not apply because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2509 - 2005-03-31
that the IAD does not apply because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2509 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene E. Volk - 2000AP001057
that the IAD does not apply because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2510 - 2005-03-31
that the IAD does not apply because no detainer was lodged against Volk and the warrant issued for Volk’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2510 - 2005-03-31
Columbia County v. Gary O. Kloostra - 2001AP001319
that the County should have obtained a warrant prior to analyzing the blood sample it withdrew from him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
that the County should have obtained a warrant prior to analyzing the blood sample it withdrew from him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard John Jarvis - 2013AP001784
, the officers obtained a search warrant for the residence and eventually discovered illegal drugs when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113224 - 2017-09-21
, the officers obtained a search warrant for the residence and eventually discovered illegal drugs when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113224 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas E. Dahl - 2001AP000489
Consent Law is a separate search, requiring a warrant. We disagree and affirm. No. 01-0489-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3637 - 2017-09-19
Consent Law is a separate search, requiring a warrant. We disagree and affirm. No. 01-0489-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3637 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas E. Dahl - 2001AP000489
, and that testing blood drawn in compliance with the Implied Consent Law is a separate search, requiring a warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3637 - 2005-03-31
, and that testing blood drawn in compliance with the Implied Consent Law is a separate search, requiring a warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3637 - 2005-03-31